Skip to main content

The Japanese Earthquake

NEI is posting updates throughout the day on the huge earthquake in Japan (8.9 on the Richter Scale, the fifth largest on record) and especially on the effect it might have on the country’s nuclear power plants. Click here for updates, with plentiful links to more information.

The American Nuclear Society also has a page up. Click here for that. And this page at the World Nuclear Association provides a map showing the location of Japan’s nuclear plants and a lot of other information about nuclear energy in Japan. It also has up a page of news and links about the earthquake.

Please put any good links you find in comments.

Comments

sportsfan1981 said…
The damage and destruction from the earthquake and tsunami in Japan looks massive! I hope the United States and other countries make substantial contributions to the relief efforts there.
Johan said…
I was gathering and updating the nuclear power yes please blog continuously through the day today. Most of it is things taken out of English news but some of it is comments in swedish. Here is a google translate link to the blog post

http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=sv&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=sv&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fnuclearpoweryesplease.org%2Fblog%2F2011%2F03%2F11%2Fden-japanska-jordbavningen-och-karnkraftverken%2F

And here is a link to the original
http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/2011/03/11/den-japanska-jordbavningen-och-karnkraftverken/
gunter said…
howdy folks,

a nuclear accident anywhere is a nuclear accident everywhere.

http://www.beyondnuclear.org/?SSLogoutOk=true

gunter
TheEngineer said…
The following are good, informative sites:

http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/RS_Battle_to_stabilise_earthquake_reactors_1203111.html

www.anengineerindc.com

http://atomicinsights.blogspot.com/
Anonymous said…
Howdy, Buckaroos,

The INES classification for this event is Level 4, which means an accident with local consequences. When it is all added up, that's what it will almost certainly turn out to be. Very unfortuante that the plant was damaged and will take time and money to repair and return to service. Equally unfortunate that its output is now unavailable to support national recovery operations.

And those are the really dire issues right now. You've got something like 9,500 people unaccounted for in that one prefecture. The threat of aftershocks and subsequent tsunamis is still very real.
Aaron Rizzio said…
The big take away as I see it from Fukushima Daiichi thus far should be how resilient these old reactor designs are despite the back-up diesel generators being tsunami- flooded and, apparently, the first dreaded LWR hydrogen explosion above the BWR's vapor suppression pool (of course the new reactor designs can rely on natural coolant circulation). This earthquake was reportedly the most powerful in Japan's history and the fifth most powerful seismic event recorded ever; essentially a 1000-year phenomenon and yet there has been no mass casualty event contra the alarums continuously raised by misguided critics.

I would not be equally optimistic regarding the survivability of any on or off-shore wave, tidal, or wind-farm or array of solar collectors and those tasked with maintaining them in the wake of such an earthquake & tsunami.

And, as I'm sure Mr Paul Gunter agrees, we all hope that LWR-fission keeps its perfect radiological human safety record --media reports of people being treated for "radiation sickness" are in fact instances of individuals believed to have been merely "exposed" to elevated radiation levels and evacuated from the site for medical evaluation. 237 people suffered acute radiation sickness (31 acute fatalities) as a result of Chernobyl's RBMK explosion, not meltdown -- and not a LWR.
Anonymous said…
Hey Gunter,

I checked out your link, but the articles there seem pretty sparse in facts, and the beyond nuclear website doesn't allow comments. So, I think I'll stay here where open discussion is encouraged!
Steve said…
This will be the end of the "nuclear renaissance" in the United States.
Anonymous said…
Steve --

Afraid you may be right. I hope everyone enjoys breathing coal-fired arsenic and CO2, and shivering in the dark every time the sun goes behind clouds or the wind dies down.

Popular posts from this blog

A Billion Miles Under Nuclear Energy (Updated)

And the winner is…Cassini-Huygens, in triple overtime.

The spaceship conceived in 1982 and launched fifteen years later, will crash into Saturn on September 15, after a mission of 19 years and 355 days, powered by the audacity and technical prowess of scientists and engineers from 17 different countries, and 72 pounds of plutonium.

The mission was so successful that it was extended three times; it was intended to last only until 2008.

Since April, the ship has been continuing to orbit Saturn, swinging through the 1,500-mile gap between the planet and its rings, an area not previously explored. This is a good maneuver for a spaceship nearing the end of its mission, since colliding with a rock could end things early.

Cassini will dive a little deeper and plunge toward Saturn’s surface, where it will transmit data until it burns up in the planet’s atmosphere. The radio signal will arrive here early Friday morning, Eastern time. A NASA video explains.

In the years since Cassini has launc…

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Missing the Point about Pennsylvania’s Nuclear Plants

A group that includes oil and gas companies in Pennsylvania released a study on Monday that argues that twenty years ago, planners underestimated the value of nuclear plants in the electricity market. According to the group, that means the state should now let the plants close.

Huh?

The question confronting the state now isn’t what the companies that owned the reactors at the time of de-regulation got or didn’t get. It’s not a question of whether they were profitable in the '80s, '90s and '00s. It’s about now. Business works by looking at the present and making projections about the future.

Is losing the nuclear plants what’s best for the state going forward?

Pennsylvania needs clean air. It needs jobs. And it needs protection against over-reliance on a single fuel source.


What the reactors need is recognition of all the value they provide. The electricity market is depressed, and if electricity is treated as a simple commodity, with no regard for its benefit to clean air o…