tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10911751.post111669261384877538..comments2024-03-07T02:00:01.582-05:00Comments on NEI Nuclear Notes: CNN Poll On Nuclear EnergyUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10911751.post-1134081814539512012005-12-08T17:43:00.000-05:002005-12-08T17:43:00.000-05:00Matthew, I owe you an apology. As it turns out, Pr...Matthew, I owe you an apology. As it turns out, President Clinton reinstated Carter's ban on reprocessing. So in the off-again on-again world of energy 'leadership' it currently is neither economic nor permitted, by effect of executive policy. <BR/><BR/>Here's one reference.<BR/><BR/>http://www.nei.org/index.asp?catnum=4&catid=822 <BR/><BR/>I did find others on 'net...Kelly L Taylorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04551235640919123033noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10911751.post-1116890092425373182005-05-23T19:14:00.000-04:002005-05-23T19:14:00.000-04:00I stand corrected re the lawfulness of reprocessin...I stand corrected re the lawfulness of reprocessing in the US. I am not sure that reprocessing is an economic source of reactor fuel anywhere, however, I believe that other countries pursue reprocessing as a waste minimization strategy. Perhaps the DOE should consider establishing a reprocessing facility to minimize the waste, paid for out of the disposal fund, with sales of mox used to partially offset the cost of reprocessing. The isolated vitrified or synroced waste left over could then be stored at Yucca Mountain.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10911751.post-1116882621336890812005-05-23T17:10:00.000-04:002005-05-23T17:10:00.000-04:00Reprocessing is *not* illegal in the USA. Althoug...Reprocessing is *not* illegal in the USA. Although President Carter was against it, President Reagan reversed his reprocessing policies. Economics do not currently favor reprocessing in the US; nobody is doing it because there is no profit in it, when compared to the cost of producing fuel via the once-through uranium fuel cycle.Kelly L Taylorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04551235640919123033noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10911751.post-1116866883579412982005-05-23T12:48:00.000-04:002005-05-23T12:48:00.000-04:00There are a number of options available for long t...There are a number of options available for long term storage of used fuel in a once through system, see http://www.uic.com.au/nip.htm for a number of briefing papers prepared by the Uranium Infomation Centre in Australia. My preferred option is to reprocess (currently illegal in the USA) to recover the fissile and fertile materials (including U235, U238 and Pu) for recycling as fuel, and isolating the remaining wastes in Synroc®. Pu has a half life of 24,000 years, however if it is recycled, it will be transmuted into other elements by the chain reaction. Waste products from reprocessing have much shorter half-lives and only need to be isolated for approximately 300 years. The toxic waste from the nuclear fuel cycle is far smaller in quantity than the toxic waste from coal fired plants - which is largely unregulated.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10911751.post-1116725122038598302005-05-21T21:25:00.000-04:002005-05-21T21:25:00.000-04:00If your grandchildren can read, I suggest that the...If your grandchildren can read, I suggest that they look at the following site, which contains some useful information:<BR/><A HREF="http://www.ocrwm.doe.gov/ymp/about/" REL="nofollow">http://www.ocrwm.doe.gov/ymp/about/</A>Brian Mayshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13962229896535398120noreply@blogger.com