tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10911751.post114979474248049590..comments2024-03-07T02:00:01.582-05:00Comments on NEI Nuclear Notes: Revisiting Uranium... AgainUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10911751.post-46171233465068651692008-06-30T02:37:00.000-04:002008-06-30T02:37:00.000-04:00Wow, I was totally pro-nuclear until I read some o...Wow, I was totally pro-nuclear until I read some of these links. If the Earth only has enough known reserves of Uranium to fuel 85 years worth electricity at 2004 levels, the cost/benefit of building complex power plants with expensive fuel processing options is not so rosy. Even if unknown reserves may be nine times greater than known, as mentioned, how many decades of additional energy will be achievable, if all power plants are converted to the nuclear option. I thought we had thousands of years of fuel, not decades, or perhaps a century or two. That's a drop in the bucket when considering our time already spent here on Earth.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10911751.post-1154364879727225902006-07-31T12:54:00.000-04:002006-07-31T12:54:00.000-04:00The link was broken because they changed the title...The link was broken because they changed the title of the post. I've since updated <A HREF="http://world-nuclear.blogspot.com/2006/06/uranium-sustainability.html" REL="nofollow">the link</A>.Eric McErlainhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16845846046464525505noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10911751.post-1154364609273357172006-07-31T12:50:00.000-04:002006-07-31T12:50:00.000-04:00Could you please fix your link to the "World Nucle...Could you please fix your link to the "World Nuclear Association" which seems to point to blogger and not an international agency linkRowanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04419181373277122261noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10911751.post-1154364543164064052006-07-31T12:49:00.000-04:002006-07-31T12:49:00.000-04:00Could you please fix your link to the "World Nucle...Could you please fix your link to the "World Nuclear Association" which seems to point to blogger and not an international agency linkRowanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04419181373277122261noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10911751.post-1150070345518410072006-06-11T19:59:00.000-04:002006-06-11T19:59:00.000-04:00Unfortunately you are right, Eric. You will have ...Unfortunately you are right, Eric. You will have to repeat yourself time and time again. The palybook for the antinuclear crowd hasn't changed since Ralph Nader penned it almost two decades ago, adng they keep rehashing the same old arguements. <BR/><BR/>The Australian Green and Labor parties are doing the same thing in claiming that nuclear energy is "too unsafe, too expensive, and too dangerous." I took on their arguements point by point in episode 21 of "This Week in Nuclear".<BR/><BR/>It's available at my new URL http://thisweekinnuclear.com<BR/><BR/>Keep up the good work!<BR/><BR/>JohnJ Wheelerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01297139247058382607noreply@blogger.com