tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10911751.post4989417663761087946..comments2024-03-07T02:00:01.582-05:00Comments on NEI Nuclear Notes: U.S. and India to Announce Details of Bilateral Nuclear AgreementUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10911751.post-65901418933405598592007-08-21T17:39:00.000-04:002007-08-21T17:39:00.000-04:00I did not see any followup. But the New York Time...I did not see any followup. But the <I>New York Times</I> kindly filled that gap, with an editorial published August 5, entitled "“A Bad Deal Gets Worse.” As they declined to publish my rebuttal following, perhaps you would be willing to consider? This is approximately 150 words, per their policy for letters, but I would be delighted to provide you an expanded version, if you would be willing to consider posting same.<BR/><BR/><B>An Imperfect Good Deal</B><BR/><BR/> Re “A Bad Deal Gets Worse” (New York Times editorial, August 5).<BR/><BR/> The agreement reduces India’s capacity to produce nuclear weapons, by placing its “civilian nuclear facilities under … safeguards <I>in perpetuity</I>.”<BR/><BR/> It ensures fuel for civilian nuclear energy. This reduces the risk some future government will discard that program, to focus India’s considerable nuclear capability on weapons.<BR/><BR/> The reprocessing arrangement will allow India to apply its existing reprocessing capability to dispose of spent fuel in the manner most appropriate to its situation. It also will provide incentive for India’s fast breeder reactors to be declared as civilian. <BR/><BR/> The agreement is a creative effort to bring India “in from the nuclear cold.” India will not accept nonproliferation measures (e.g., fissile-material cutoff) perceived as harming its deterrence toward two nuclear-armed neighbors.<BR/><BR/> The agreement is another of the choices between the unattainable perfect and some attainable good that mark the history of nuclear nonproliferation efforts.<BR/><BR/><I>Paul Nelson is professor emeritus of computer science, nuclear engineering and mathematics at Texas A&M University, a fellow of the American Nuclear Society and Associate Director for International Affairs in Texas A&M University’s Nuclear Security Science and Policy Institute. The opinions expressed are the authors’ personal views and do not represent official positions of any institution.</I><BR/><BR/>Phones: 979-845-4132 (O)<BR/> 979-229-7421 (C)<BR/>1102 Woodhaven Circle<BR/>College Station, TX 77840Paul Nelsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10117908438422137263noreply@blogger.com