tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10911751.post8424920915638329414..comments2024-03-07T02:00:01.582-05:00Comments on NEI Nuclear Notes: Jack Spencer's Power PlayUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10911751.post-4908747725546957872008-07-22T11:57:00.000-04:002008-07-22T11:57:00.000-04:00Even if man-made global warming is a hoax, aren't ...Even if man-made global warming is a hoax, aren't unsustainability (oil/natural gas) and noxious pollution (coal) good arguments against fossil fuels?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10911751.post-80838902693267658382008-02-12T15:43:00.000-05:002008-02-12T15:43:00.000-05:00When I read this excerpt I was immediately concern...When I read this excerpt I was immediately concerned that despite the reasoned argument, the final line would condemn the entire thing in the minds of most people. Here's the line:<BR/><BR/>If it does turn out that CO2 is a problem — a conclusion for which there is no consensus, despite what we're told — then the role of nuclear energy will be even more critical.<BR/><BR/>Denial that man-made CO2 is a problem is not the way to convince anyone that we need to build more nukes. <BR/><BR/>See the preceding comment for yet another take on this. (the "reasonable" part of the argument is the denial ...)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10911751.post-67310581329262585442008-02-12T12:43:00.000-05:002008-02-12T12:43:00.000-05:00Thank goodness I can read a voice of reason. I'm ...Thank goodness I can read a voice of reason. I'm so sick of the manmade global warming alarmists----will intelligence win this argument or will emotion railroad the world into ridiculous measures to control a non-existent carbon emissions problem? God hep us all.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11624394732405283419noreply@blogger.com