Skip to main content

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site:

NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions

Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues

• There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website.

• The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recovering from an accident.

• Japan’s prime minister, in a major policy speech Tuesday, pledged his administration to “redouble its concerted efforts to bring the nuclear accident to a conclusion.” Speaking to Japan’s Diet, Yoshihiko Noda said, “To ensure that there is no recurrence of such a nuclear accident, we will work tenaciously to identify the causes of the accident based on international perspectives and will provide comprehensive information on such causes and prevention measures.” Noda said that nuclear energy facilities undergoing safety inspections will be restarted, but he added that the country must reduce its use of nuclear energy.

Plant Status

• Tokyo Electric Power Co. reports that contaminated water levels at the plant continue to decline. Since June, TEPCO has been using a system that decontaminates radioactive water from the site and recycles it as coolant for the reactors. The company says accumulated contaminated water is contained in the basements of the turbine buildings.

• A magnitude 6.0 earthquake, centered off shore, occurred near the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station in the early morning hours of Sept. 12. One of two temporary air control compressors for reactor 1 malfunctioned after the earthquake and was replaced with a backup diesel compressor. No other damage was reported.

New Products

• A question in the “Ask the Experts” section on NEI’s Safety First website asks how nuclear plants ensure they have sufficient funds to cover decommissioning costs in the event of an accident. The answer: Facility operators must make ongoing contributions to a decommissioning fund. Here is the response.

Media Highlights

• Some areas near the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant may remain off-limits for years, National Public Radio reports.

Upcoming Events

• The NRC commissioners will be briefed in a public meeting Oct. 11 on prioritization of long-term recommendations from its Japan task force. The briefing will be webcast.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…

Nuclear Is a Long-Term Investment for Ohio that Will Pay Big

With 50 different state legislative calendars, more than half of them adjourn by June, and those still in session throughout the year usually take a recess in the summer. So springtime is prime time for state legislative activity. In the next few weeks, legislatures are hosting hearings and calling for votes on bills that have been battered back and forth in the capital halls.

On Tuesday, The Ohio Public Utilities Committee hosted its third round of hearings on the Zero Emissions Nuclear Resources Program, House Bill 178, and NEI’s Maria Korsnick testified before a jam-packed room of legislators.


Washingtonians parachuting into state debates can be a tricky platform, but in this case, Maria’s remarks provided national perspective that put the Ohio conundrum into context. At the heart of this debate is the impact nuclear plants have on local jobs and the local economy, and that nuclear assets should be viewed as “long-term investments” for the state. Of course, clean air and electrons …