Hurricane Katrina and Natural Gas Supply

Our friend Rod Adams takes note of how Hurricane Katrina is disrupting America's domestic natural gas supply at a particularly inopportune time:

This is supposed to be the beginning of the "storage" season when demand from air conditioning begins to fall and heating demand has not yet picked up. It is the time of year when the salt caverns that serve as storage facilities for methane are filled up so that there is adequate capacity to respond to those cold winter days. Because of the lowered demands in the electricity market, prices during this time of year are traditionally a bit lower, thus helping to keep the cost for gas in the winter lower than it would have been.

This cycle is being disrupted. Not only are prices high, but there is limited production and transportation available for the gas that would be stored. It might become a very cold and expensive winter for some people, a prospect that seems almost hard to contemplate right now.

All too true. Since 1992, America has built an abundance of natural gas-fired electric capacity, and that's put tremendous pressure on natural gas markets. The disruption of supply from Hurricane Katrina is sure to hurt this Winter.

Technorati tags: Nuclear Energy Hurricane Katrina Natural Gas Environment Energy Politics Technology Economics

Comments

Kevin McCoy said…

Supply disruptions are always a problem, but Rod's comments remind me of one of the strengths of nuclear: There is a large inventory of fuel in the core. Most U.S. plants operate on 18-month refueling cycles, so a disruption in fuel supply, even for a month, will usually not cause the plant to go down.

September 2, 2005 at 12:22 PM

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...

Fluor Invests in NuScale

You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap...

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

NEI Nuclear Notes

Search This Blog