Skip to main content

Westinghouse Goes to Toshiba

An event that had been talked about for a few weeks finally came about today, as Toshiba announced that it had completed an agreement with British Nuclear Fuels to acquire Westinghouse. The final price tag: $5.4 billion (U.S.):
``Given the potential we believe what we've paid is the correct price, there was a lot of competition,'' Atsutoshi Nishida, Toshiba president, said today during a press conference in London. The acquisition will triple Toshiba's nuclear energy business, he said.

Toshiba is seeking to expand its power plant operations as the company expects the market for atomic energy to expand by 50 percent by 2020. Westinghouse will give Toshiba the pressurized water reactor technology preferred by China, which may spend as much as $54 billion by that year building nuclear stations.

The price paid for the business, up from $3.2 billion during an auction three weeks before Toshiba was chosen last month as the preferred bidder, is almost five times the $1.1 billion the U.K. government paid for Westinghouse in 1999. Toshiba trumped bids from companies including General Electric Co. and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd.
Toshiba also announced that it would be selling portions of Westinghouse to a number of minority investors, but that Toshiba would still retain control of at least 51 percent of Westinghouse.

For more from Toshiba, read their official press announcement.

Technorati tags: , , , , , AP-1000

Comments

Anonymous said…
It's sad, in a way, to see another of these former industrial giants in the US, icons of a former role as leader of the world in manufacturing, being sold out in the foreign marketplace. Westinghouse Electric Co. was an innovator in many ways, being involved in the early development of AC power distribution, manufacturer of generators and steam supply systems, appliances, and other consumer goods. Today it is a shadow of it's former self. The business paradigm currently in vogue in this country, which seems to be sell everything out to foreigners to increase short-term "profits", lacks a long-term vision. Selling out for a quick buck often leaves nothing behind to build on.
Matthew66 said…
US companies are not backward in coming forward when it comes to buying foreign firms, so one ought not to complain too loudly when a foreign company buys a former US company. Westinghouse has been foreign owned since 1999 when it was purchased from CBS by British Nuclear Fuels Limited, which is wholly owned by the British Government. At least now it is not owned by a foreign government. It is also likely that Toshiba will sell minority interests to US companies.

General Electric bid for Westinghouse, although I suspect that even if it had been the highest bidder, GE would have lost on the grounds that a merger would significantly reduce competition for the supply of new reactors to the US market.
Anonymous said…
I think ABB owned it before BNFL. But it's true that it is kind of distrurbing to see these former giants of US industry being sold out to foreigners. It took a lot of hard work to build what we have (had). It's unfortunate that things have come to pass that Americans would rather sell out than build up.
Anonymous said…
It is sad to see a company such as Westinghouse that had such great potential -- be sold to a foreign-owned company. The top Management at Westinghouse did not do their job. They should have performed better and made the company what it should be -- U.S. owned. It is clear, that poor Management is the demise of Westinghouse today in the year 2006.
Anonymous said…
It is sad to see a company such as Westinghouse that had such great potential -- be sold to a foreign-owned company. The top Management at Westinghouse did not do their job. They should have performed better and made the company what it should be -- U.S. owned. It is clear, that poor Management is the demise of Westinghouse today in the year 2006.

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...