Skip to main content

NEI's Bowman Receives Honorary Knighthood

From the NEI Newsroom:
Retired Admiral Frank L. “Skip” Bowman, president and chief executive officer of the Nuclear Energy Institute, was made an Honorary Knight Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire (KBE) by British Ambassador Sir David Manning during an investiture ceremony at the British Embassy in Washington.

Bowman was awarded one of the U.K.’s highest honors in recognition of his commitment in support of Royal Navy submarine programs during his tenure as Director, U.S. Naval Reactors.

In remarks during the ceremony, Sir David Manning said, “Despite his heavy responsibilities in the U.S. Navy and Department of Energy, Skip Bowman made regular visits to the United Kingdom, developing enduring relationships. His willingness to develop a better understanding of Royal Navy programs and to offer advice was invaluable. His personal involvement brought about unprecedented levels of cooperation between the Royal Navy and the United States Navy.”

“It is quite an honor for me,” said Bowman, “and I accept the honor on behalf of the many fine professionals that I served with at Naval Reactors.”

The proclamation honoring Bowman was personally signed by Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh. The honor of Knighthood dates back to medieval chivalry, from which also comes the method used in the United Kingdom of conferring a Knighthood by the touch of a sword known as the accolade.

The Most Excellent Order of the British Empire was founded in 1917 by King George V to recognize those serving in World War I in different capacities. This award honors civilians and service personnel for public service or outstanding contribution to society. Knight Commander (KBE) is among the highest within the realm of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire. The Knighthood is honorary because Bowman is an American citizen.

Bowman joins other notable Americans including Bill Gates, Rudolph Giuliani, Tommy Franks, Bob Hope, Edward R. Murrow and Rev. Billy Graham as KBE recipients.

A native of Chattanooga, Tenn., Bowman became president and CEO of the Nuclear Energy Institute in 2005, after a 38-year career in the U.S. Navy that ended in December 2004.

At the time of his retirement, Bowman was an admiral serving as director of the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program; he was the third successor to Adm. Hyman G. Rickover in that command. Bowman also was deputy administrator for naval reactors in the National Nuclear Security Administration of the Department of Energy. In these dual positions, he was responsible for the operations of more than 100 reactors aboard the Navy’s aircraft carriers and submarines, four training sites and two Department of Energy laboratories in Pittsburgh and Schenectady, N.Y.
To read more about the honor, click here.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Hi,
A knight with no horse, hmmm?

"Tony Blair's backing for nuclear power suffered a blow yesterday when the Government's own advisory body on sustainable development came down firmly against the building of a new generation of reactors."

Appeared in UK's The Independent on March 7, 2006. The blog disallowed me posting the URL, but you get the picture, all the same reasons:
-no long term strategy for nuclear waste
-economic risks of constructing unproven designs w/taxpayers left holding the bag
-danger of massive nuclear investment locking UK future into centralized energy production system for the next half century
-nuclear power undermines efforts to maximize energy efficiency programs
-terrorist targes and radiation risks associated with other countries with lower safety standards.

Paul, NIRS

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...

How Much Land Does Nuclear, Wind and Solar Really Need?

Not too long ago, we reviewed a report that looked at nuclear energy (and other energy sources) as biodiversity agents. This had to do, in part, with the amount of land a facility needs to function. Nuclear energy and fossil fuel plants use relatively little, wind farms and solar arrays quite a lot of land . Based on an objective and transparent analysis of our sustainable energy choices, we have come to the evidence-based conclusion that nuclear energy is a good option for biodiversity conservation (and society in general) and that other alternatives to fossil fuels should be subjected to the same cost–benefit analyses (in terms of biodiversity and climate outcomes, as well as sociopolitical imperatives) before accepting or dismissing them. Writer Barry Brook, who collected 75 scientists to endorse his paper, is interested in land use as it impacts flora and fauna. Biodiversity concerns do not get as much play as they might – and, when they do, it annoys many when land is withdraw...