Skip to main content

EU Rejects Kozloduy Appeal, Even in the Face of Rising Electricity Prices

By Eric McErlain
From the EU Observer:
Bulgaria's plea to restart two reactors at the Kozloduy nuclear power plant has suffered a blow, with the European Commission appearing to reject the idea despite growing pressure from the Balkans in support of Sofia.

On Monday (13 March), four Balkan countries - Serbia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Albania and Croatia - adopted a declaration, asking the EU to allow Bulgaria to resume electricity production and warning of grim consequences if the two reactors were not reopened.

"We are concerned about the current electricity supply problems of the region, which could result in higher economic and political instability," the common statement, cited by the BBC, said. The statement also claimed that electricity prices had jumped 80-100% when compared with last year.

Prior to the shut-down in 2006, Bulgaria exported 7.8 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity, the amount that roughly equals to what the two nuclear reactors in Kozloduy produced.
I guess the EU would rather have these member states importing Russian natural gas to generate their electricity. For more from our archive, click here.
Labels:

Comments

Joffan said…
Crazy.

I suggest that Bulgaria accepts that Kozloduy 3 & 4 are closed, paints over the numbers and looks to open the new reactors Kozloduy 7 & 8.
March 14, 2007 at 12:42 PM
Anonymous said…
Another idea would be that the Bulgarians tell the EU bureaucrats to stuff it. A nation has a duty to its citizens to look out for their welfare. Energy supply is a national interest. It makes no sense that the EU would compel a sovereign state to stick it's head in the noose of relying on Russian natural gas.
March 14, 2007 at 5:13 PM
Joffan said…
Yes... The Bulgarians would of course need to return the compensation money given to them by the EU but I imagine that was already part of the Bulgarians' restart request.
March 15, 2007 at 2:29 PM
Anonymous said…
Sounds like it's a no-brainer. Return the bribe money and go a long way towards energy self-sufficiency, or accept the bribe and put yourself at the mercy of your Russian natural gas supplier. A lot of good that EU payoff will be to the Bulgarians when they find themselves at the end of a short rope held by Putin.
March 16, 2007 at 1:57 PM
Anonymous said…
1. Neither of the mentioned countries had different problems than during other years - Albania even managed to crank up its electricity availability from January because of upcoming elections.
2. Cernavoda 2 comes on-line after summer, keeping the existing over-capacity in the region well on level.
3. None of the involved countries in the region has a development plan for energy efficiency and/or renewable energy.

conclusion: the discussion about Kozloduy 3 and 4 is only to try to get more compensation from the EU...
April 3, 2007 at 7:29 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

By
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
23 comments
Read more

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

By
You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...
6 comments
Read more

How Much Land Does Nuclear, Wind and Solar Really Need?

By
Not too long ago, we reviewed a report that looked at nuclear energy (and other energy sources) as biodiversity agents. This had to do, in part, with the amount of land a facility needs to function. Nuclear energy and fossil fuel plants use relatively little, wind farms and solar arrays quite a lot of land . Based on an objective and transparent analysis of our sustainable energy choices, we have come to the evidence-based conclusion that nuclear energy is a good option for biodiversity conservation (and society in general) and that other alternatives to fossil fuels should be subjected to the same cost–benefit analyses (in terms of biodiversity and climate outcomes, as well as sociopolitical imperatives) before accepting or dismissing them. Writer Barry Brook, who collected 75 scientists to endorse his paper, is interested in land use as it impacts flora and fauna. Biodiversity concerns do not get as much play as they might – and, when they do, it annoys many when land is withdraw...
4 comments
Read more