News from the 2007 Nuclear Energy Assembly

While we've got a skeleton crew working at NEI's offices in Washington, D.C., a significant portion of our staff has spent this week in Miami working at the 2007 Nuclear Energy Assembly, the annual meeting of the nuclear energy industry.

While the meeting concludes today, there was a lot of action yesterday, including the two speeches that traditionally serve as the centerpiece of the event. This year's theme is "The Changing Climate for Nuclear Energy," and it's more than adequately reflected in the remarks delivered by John W. Rowe and NEI's Chairman and Skip Bowman, NEI's President and CEO.

Here's an excerpt from Skip's remarks that should give you a flavor of where things are headed:

Discussion and debate over how to address climate change is dominating the policy agenda in Washington and across the country. The Nuclear Energy Institute has never taken a position on climate issues but we will, over the next several months, be working with the NEI Executive Committee and our member companies to define an appropriate policy position for the only carbon-free technology that’s available today and capable of large-scale expansion.

It may well be past time to abandon the notion that a voluntary, “best effort” approach, by itself, represents a viable policy. As the world’s largest economy and most powerful nation, the United States has a responsibility to provide leadership on critical issues with major geopolitical implications.

Click here for a press release that summarizes both speeches. For other news from NEA 2007, click here and here.

Putting together this meeting takes a tremendous amount of effort, and I want to take a moment to congratulate all of my colleagues who worked so hard to put on this event. Congratulations on a job well done.

Comments

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...

NEI Nuclear Notes

Search This Blog