Skip to main content

Australia to Sell Uranium to India

By Eric McErlain
From Nuc Net:
Australia has decided to change its foreign policy to allow the export of uranium to India, but only subject to a number of “strict conditions”, prime minister John Howard has announced.

In a statement today Mr Howard said conditions for uranium exports to India, which has not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), include:

• Conclusion of a suitable safeguards agreement between India and the
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) covering all designated civil nuclear facilities;

• A consensus decision by the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) to
make an exception to its guidelines enabling international civil supply to India;

• Conclusion of a bilateral civil nuclear cooperation agreement between
India and the US;

• Satisfactory progress in implementing India’s commitment to place
designated civil nuclear facilities under IAEA safeguards in perpetuity.

Mr Howard said Australian uranium supply to India would also be conditional on the conclusion of a bilateral Australia-India safeguards agreement providing assurances that Australian uranium would remain in peaceful uses at all times. He said there must be satisfactory verification arrangements to ensure that no Australian nuclear materials supplied to India would contribute to any military purpose.

Mr Howard said uranium exports would be of “significant economic and strategic advantage to both countries”. He said the uranium industry already generates 658 million Australian dollars (520 million US dollars, 387 million
euro) annually in exports and India will be a large and growing market.

“India’s requirement for reliable, clean sources of energy is growing rapidly,” Mr Howard said. “India will build 11 new reactors to triple her energy generation from nuclear power and is projected to need up to 12,000 tonnes of uranium per annum to 2032.”

India and the US recently finalised the text of a bilateral agreement for peaceful nuclear cooperation. The so-called “123 agreement” will allow full civil nuclear energy cooperation between the two countries, including nuclear energy research, civil nuclear cooperation covering nuclear reactors and the nuclear fuel cycle, and development of a strategic reserve of nuclear fuel.

The agreement must still be approved by the US Congress, while India needs to get clearances from the NSG and also conclude an agreement to place its civilian reactors under IAEA safeguards.
As you might recall, we did project that something like this might happen last December.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

By
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
23 comments
Read more

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

By
Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...
7 comments
Read more

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

By
You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...
6 comments
Read more