Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
Comments
But not Yuca mountain, lets build somethying new. Why? Nothing specific, just doesn't seem safe.
How long did it take to build Yuca mountain? Started more than a decade ago. How long will it take to build somewhere else?
Sounds to me like: "I support noise makers at birthday parties as long as nobody makes any noise."
Phony.
McCain said there was “no way that you could ever seriously attack the issue of greenhouse gas emissions without nuclear power, and anybody who tells you differently is not telling the truth.”
Which of these men is speaking definitively and without fear of the polls?
Neither. Bisconti Research and NEI tell us most Americans want new nuclear plants, right? So he's in line with the polls.
McCain as maverick is one of the biggest myths in Washington.
Sure. Obama is a lawyer, and his "belief" about Yucca Mountain clearly does not come from his own personal expertise.
So Obama is apparently willing to cut off the independent scientific review of Yucca Mountain by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, probably because he "believes" that the NRC's likely positive conclusion on Yucca Mountain would not correspond with his negative "belief" about the Yucca Mountain's safety.
So an Obama administration will use the best science to inform its nuclear energy policy decisions. Sure.
where has he said this? source?
"Obama is a lawyer, and his "belief" about Yucca Mountain clearly does not come from his own personal expertise."
what's McCain's technical background in nuclear power?
Anyone here believe that a relatively inexperienced politician lawyer will do what is right instead of what furthers their political career?
McCain has at least had much more life experiences in the military (big user of nuclear power) and the Senate (boss of the NRC) with respect to nuclear power and politics than Obama. Wisdom comes with age and exposure only.