Skip to main content

The End of Nuclear Waste?

tcfo We’re pretty sure this is how we got The Incredible Hulk:

The NIF [National Ignition Facility] team will fire nearly 200 individual laser beams generated by an accelerator the size of a football field. The beams converge on a single target chamber containing a capsule of hydrogen. The hope is to compress it, and creating a subatomic reaction called fusion, ultimately igniting a controlled version of the same thermo-nuclear combustion that takes place on the sun.

Yes, this would indeed be fusion, under the auspices of the Lawrence Livermore Labs in California.

We have demonstrated that we can break every barrier," said NIF project manager Bruno Van Wonterghem. "We have broken the energetics barrier for the largest laser in the world. This is not only the highest energy laser, it is also the most precision laser in the world."

"And believe it or not, this is where we take the hydrogen in water and using Einstein's equation, turn mass into energy," explained NIF director Ed Moses.

"We're talking about igniting at the nuclear level and burning matter and turning it into energy," said Moses. "It's a very new thing. When we do this, it will change the way people think about their future."

To quote Rameses, Big talk for a guy wearing sandals, Moses. And how might this effect nuclear energy?

"That is a very interesting particle because it can penetrate the nucleus of another atom. So now we could take nuclear waste and use those neutrons to bust it up, get energy and remove the waste," said Moses.

To literally re-burn nuclear waste, engineers would create a separate compartment around the fusion chamber. The escaping neutrons would pass through the radioactive waste, igniting it. The result -- tons of material now piling up at nuclear storage sites around the country could potentially be burned a second time, taking most of the radioactivity out of it in the process.

We do take this seriously – the labs have been working on this for 10 years – and the science behind it is very interesting to the extent we understand it (to the extent we don’t, it’s likely even more interesting), but we’ve read enough about fusion to learn caution. And we’re not the only ones:

But they admit, the chances of a life engine plant becoming reality ultimately depends on one of the biggest experiments of our time, and whether hundreds of lasers can trigger fusion, creating energy from water.

Not sure how one judges an experiment the biggest – the Large Hadon Collider would seem up there too – but we’d bet success plays a big role. And we’ll add the usual issues about fusion when considering success – scaling, reliability, not soaking up more energy than it produces (a big issue in fusion) and of course, the little matter of turning Bruce Banner green. But we’ve only got a month to wait. We’ll see soon enough.

And by all means, click over here for a lot more, a lot of it fascinating, including a virtual tour. You too can thrill to having a couple hundred laser beams pointed at you.

“The final optics assemblies (FOAs) are mounted on the target chamber and convert NIF's nominal infrared (1,053-nanometer) laser light to ultraviolet (351nm) using a system of two nonlinear crystal plates made of potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KDP).” As we said above, to the extent we understand it, interesting.

Comments

Jason Ribeiro said…
To the extent that the LFTR reactor design could also "burn" nuclear waste, would that not be an easier and cheaper research and development route to accomplish the same thing?
SteveK9 said…
They've been at it for a lot more than 10 years. I had a phone interview to work in the target fabrication group in the 80's. I was really interested in fusion when I was 13 years old---in 1966. I've gotten a bit disillusioned. I'm much more interested in developments in fission - Gen IV, molten fluoride thorium, etc. than in fusion.
Luke said…
You really can't generate power out of NIF. In order to do that, you'd need a liquid lithium blanket surrounding the target chamber to capture the neutrons and breed more tritium, and you'd need a mechanism to constantly load tritium and deuterium into new target assemblies and load them into the target chamber in succession while the machine is running. You'd also need to capture the thermal energy dissipated by the neutrons scattering in the Li blanket and put the heat to work in an engine.

The ITER magnetic confinement fusion project is designed to address many of these technologies; NIF is not. NIF is very useful for what it was designed for; as a weapons physics facility, not as a power generator. It's a weapons physics facility which has had a lot of political marketing nonsense with regards to energy generation applied to it, and none of the latter makes any real sense at all.

Even to destroy higher actinides by fast fission; there are countless fission based proposals for that purpose that are far, far more well developed technologies.

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...

How Much Land Does Nuclear, Wind and Solar Really Need?

Not too long ago, we reviewed a report that looked at nuclear energy (and other energy sources) as biodiversity agents. This had to do, in part, with the amount of land a facility needs to function. Nuclear energy and fossil fuel plants use relatively little, wind farms and solar arrays quite a lot of land . Based on an objective and transparent analysis of our sustainable energy choices, we have come to the evidence-based conclusion that nuclear energy is a good option for biodiversity conservation (and society in general) and that other alternatives to fossil fuels should be subjected to the same cost–benefit analyses (in terms of biodiversity and climate outcomes, as well as sociopolitical imperatives) before accepting or dismissing them. Writer Barry Brook, who collected 75 scientists to endorse his paper, is interested in land use as it impacts flora and fauna. Biodiversity concerns do not get as much play as they might – and, when they do, it annoys many when land is withdraw...