Skip to main content

Hydraulic Fracturing

By Anonymous
With the release of the "Pickens Plan" in 2008, natural gas gained added currency as a "bridge" fuel that could reduce our dependence on oil for transportation and displace coal for baseload electrical generation. The appeal was fueled by a rapid rise in the amount of natural gas coming from new domestic sources, primarily gas-bearing shales.

While proponents have talked confidently about the potential for abundant natural gas from shales, others have expressed concern about reports of environmental damage from the chemicals used in extracting gas from shale. Home Box Office (HBO) weighed in this summer with a film full of scare stories about those chemicals. According to HBO, the film, Gasland, features "...interviews with ordinary citizens whose lives have been irreparably altered by hydraulic fracturing." The HBO web site adds, "Part verite road trip, part expose, part mystery, and part showdown, Gasland follows director Josh Fox on a 24-state investigation of the environmental effects of hydraulic fracturing."

With its parade of pitiful victims with wrenching tales of personal health tragedies, Gasland is emotionally gripping. We are in no position to judge the balance or accuracy in its rendering of the facts, but note that the artful style of the film has much in common with documentaries and films produced by spirited opponents of the nuclear power industry. Gasland has prompted numerous responses from proponents of shale gas, including for example, the Natural Gas Supply Association and the American Clean Skies Foundation. (Both sites also provide information explaining the extraction process).

Hydraulic fracturing entails injecting water under extremely high pressure to open fissures in gas-bearing rock formations deep underground. Chemical and physical additives mixed with the drilling ("fracking") fluid enhance the release of the embedded natural gas and facilitate its movement to the return pipe to the surface. Drillers consider the precise mix of additives they use to be proprietary. In most states, drillers have not been required to disclose the contents of their proprietary drilling fluids. In the Energy Policy Act of 2005, fraccing mixtures were exempted from federal coverage by the Clean Water Act. However, this July, the Senate's draft "Clean Energy Jobs and Oil Company Accountability Act of 2010" included a provision (Title XLIII) that would require disclosure of fracking mixtures by 2012, unless required sooner by a state. Additional scrutiny of hydraulic fracturing is coming from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which is researching the impacts of hydraulic fracturing and has been soliciting public input on the subject.

Whatever one thinks of the risks and benefits of gas from shale, this summer's publicity on hydraulic fracturing illustrates that political risk must be considered alongside other risks associated with each energy policy option. For this and many other reasons, we strongly support a diverse energy supply and an "all-of-the-above" national energy policy.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

By
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
23 comments
Read more

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

By
Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...
7 comments
Read more

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

By
You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...
6 comments
Read more