Skip to main content

How Ex-Im Bank Levels the Playing Field With Russia

Ted Jones
The following is a guest post by Ted Jones, Director of International Supplier Relations for NEI.

Last week, the Export-Import Bank of the United States released its annual Competitiveness Report to the U.S. Congress. The report highlighted “the ballooning of export finance around the world, particularly of the opaque, non-OECD-compliant variety.” This growth of export finance on “terms more lenient than the [OECD] Arrangement, with rates below what EXIM can offer and minimal risk-related fees,” threatens to undermine U.S. competitiveness, the report warned. Perhaps no sector illustrates the threat posed by non-OECD export finance as starkly as nuclear energy.

We have explained why Ex-Im Bank is essential for U.S. suppliers to be competitive in international nuclear energy markets. When the foreign competition is bound by OECD limits, Ex-Im Bank provides a somewhat level playing field for U.S. suppliers. When the foreign competition is unchecked by OECD rules, Ex-Im Bank cannot level playing field but keeps U.S. suppliers in the game.

As a result of U.S. leadership, the OECD has adopted uniform lending and transparency rules to prevent a global financing race to the bottom. In the nuclear sector, it has agreed to further restraints in a Nuclear Sector Understanding (NSU). Among other limits, the NSU sets minimum interests rates and maximum repayment terms; requires the repayment of principal and the payment of interest in equal installments at least twice annually; and prohibits the capitalization of interest. Nuclear energy supplier countries subject to OECD rules include Australia, Canada, members of the European Union, Japan, Korea, New Zealand, Norway and Switzerland.

Russia is not a member of the OECD and is not bound by the NSU. Russia has a made a strategic priority of capturing a larger share of the global nuclear energy market. With 13 reactors under construction around the world and many more under contract, it is progressing toward a target of 70 percent growth in nuclear energy exports by 2020. Russian nuclear energy exports have been promoted with Russian equity, Russian submarines and fear. But the consistent, decisive factor in the growth of Russia’s nuclear energy market share has been aggressive Russian financing. Finance for Russian nuclear exports comes from the Russian treasury rather than from a national export credit agency like Ex-Im Bank. While details of Russian finance are shrouded in secrecy, it has been known to feature interest rates well below OECD limits, capitalization of interest against OECD rules and generous repayment terms.

The Ex-Im Bank is vital for U.S. nuclear suppliers to compete against foreign suppliers operating under OECD restraints. Against non-OECD suppliers like Russia, the Ex-Im Bank keeps U.S. suppliers in the game. Despite inferior financing, a U.S. supplier with backing from the Ex-Im Bank meets the tender requirements of ECA support and reaches the negotiating table to discuss superior U.S. technology, operational know-how, training and industrial partnership. Without Ex-Im Bank, the U.S. nuclear supplier is out of the game – against OECD and non-OECD competition alike.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…

Nuclear Is a Long-Term Investment for Ohio that Will Pay Big

With 50 different state legislative calendars, more than half of them adjourn by June, and those still in session throughout the year usually take a recess in the summer. So springtime is prime time for state legislative activity. In the next few weeks, legislatures are hosting hearings and calling for votes on bills that have been battered back and forth in the capital halls.

On Tuesday, The Ohio Public Utilities Committee hosted its third round of hearings on the Zero Emissions Nuclear Resources Program, House Bill 178, and NEI’s Maria Korsnick testified before a jam-packed room of legislators.


Washingtonians parachuting into state debates can be a tricky platform, but in this case, Maria’s remarks provided national perspective that put the Ohio conundrum into context. At the heart of this debate is the impact nuclear plants have on local jobs and the local economy, and that nuclear assets should be viewed as “long-term investments” for the state. Of course, clean air and electrons …