Skip to main content

Why the Electricity Market Needs Reprogramming

The Energy Department’s study of the power grid is 187 pages long but it can be summarized in five words: the energy markets are failing us.

"Society places value on attributes of electricity provision beyond those compensated by the current design of the wholesale market," the study found.

Economists like to say that markets "optimize" production and consumption; that is, they set prices in a way that induces suppliers to bring forth the right amount of whatever is being traded, and lets consumers make wise decisions about how much to use, all in a way that improves everybody’s welfare. That’s true, as far as it goes.


But markets are a little like computer programs; they only do what they’re told to. The best they can do is to optimize the factor they’ve been told to use, in this case, price. The market is a tyrant with a hyper-focused goal. The electricity markets are set up almost entirely to optimize price.
But if the economy needs anything else, some policy intervention is required.

And there is a lot of intervention in the energy marketplace already. There are production tax credits for wind, investment tax credits for solar, and state quotas for both of them. There are big hydroelectric projects built by state governments or Washington. There are programs to reduce demand by collecting money from all customers, and spending it to improve the energy efficiency of others.

We need intervention now to preserve other benefits that nuclear reactors provide: resilience, diversity and reliability in the electric system; economic stimulus in the places where the plants are located; domestic industrial capability and self-sufficiency in technologies related to national defense; and clean air everywhere.

Reactors are an insurance policy against supply interruptions in gas, which are a virtual certainly in some regions in cold weather, and against coal piles that have frozen solid, and hydroelectric dams crippled by drought. Each of these reactors provides many hundreds of jobs directly, and their payrolls are the heart of the small-town economies where they operate. Their property taxes are essential to municipal budgets.

These benefits used to come without asking.

When the price of natural gas was high, and before extensive government help for renewables at the state and federal levels, the market imperfections didn’t matter to our country’s long-term goals. Now they do, and the Energy Department report recognizes that.

"Ultimately, the continued closure of traditional baseload power plants calls for a comprehensive strategy for long-term reliability and resilience," the study said. "States and regions are accepting increased risks that could affect the future reliability and resilience of electricity delivery for consumers in their regions."

It said, "a continual comprehensive regional and national review is needed to determine how a portfolio of domestic energy resources can be developed to ensure grid reliability and resilience."

We have heard some discussion lately about how policy interventions in the electricity field will threaten the “sanctity” of the markets. Markets are useful but they are not sacred. And policy can be smarter.

The above is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

Nuclear Utility Moves Up in Credit Ratings, Bank is "Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy"

Some positive signs that nuclear utilities can continue to receive positive ratings even while they finance new nuclear plants for the first time in decades: Wells Fargo upgrades SCANA to Outperform from Market Perform Wells analyst says, "YTD, SCG shares have underperformed the Regulated Electrics (total return +2% vs. +9%). Shares trade at 11.3X our 10E EPS, a modest discount to the peer group median of 11.8X. We view the valuation as attractive given a comparatively constructive regulatory environment and potential for above-average long-term EPS growth prospects ... Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy. SCG plans to participate in the development of two regulated nuclear units at a cost of $6.3B, raising legitimate concerns regarding financing and construction. We have carefully considered the risks and are comfortable with SCG’s strategy based on a highly constructive political & regulatory environment, manageable financing needs stretched out over 10 years, strong partners...