Skip to main content

A Design Team Pictures the Future of Nuclear Energy

For more than 100 years, the shape and location of human settlements has been defined in large part by energy and water. Cities grew up near natural resources like hydropower, and near water for agricultural, industrial and household use.

So what would the world look like with a new generation of small nuclear reactors that could provide abundant, clean energy for electricity, water pumping and desalination and industrial processes?

Hard to say with precision, but Third Way, the non-partisan think tank, asked the design team at the Washington, D.C. office of Gensler & Associates, an architecture and interior design firm that specializes in sustainable projects like a complex that houses the NFL’s Dallas Cowboys. The talented designers saw a blooming desert and a cozy arctic village, an old urban mill re-purposed as an energy producer, a data center that integrates solar panels on its sprawling flat roofs, a naval base and a humming transit hub.

In the converted mill, high temperature reactors nestle inside an old brick building evocative of the old warehouse beyond the outfield wall at Baltimore’s Camden Yards, providing high-temperature steam for various industrial processes, replacing fossil fuels that emit carbon dioxide when burned.

At the naval base, ships and submarines in port are “cold ironing,” meaning they draw their electricity from shore. Ports in areas with air pollution problems already practice “cold ironing,” although this usually means connecting ships to a power grid that runs at least in part on fossil fuels. (Land-based generators pollute, but less than ships’ engines do.) In this vision, the necessary energy comes from a row of small reactors near the wharf. And in an emergency, the reactors can help power the surrounding city.

In the desert oasis, a nuclear reactor built to power a city a few miles away also provides energy for cleaning up water from a brackish aquifer. That allows lush surroundings in the midst of barren hills.



In the transit hub, the reactors can charge electric cars, autonomous taxis, and buses, along with a high speed train.

In the arctic, far from the power grid, a small reactor has replaced the diesel oil that was previously shipped in by truck, barge or even by airplane, all of which costs money and energy. Wind turbines are integrated into the grid, which is isolated but powerful.

And at the data farm, six modular reactors are humming along, with space left for four more, as requirements grow.

One of the forces behind the designs, Suzy Hobbs Baker, a communications advisor at Third Way, said that she had always wanted to add public art to existing nuclear sites, because not everybody likes huge masses of bare concrete. But painting the exterior of an operating reactor can be complicated, she said. She has, however, worked up two designs: a pattern like a double-helix DNA strand for cooling towers and a reactor containment and cooling tower painted like an impressionistic view of the sea, a hint at part of the environment that reactors preserve.

For a new reactor, she said, she’d like to have the aesthetics “baked in from the get-go.”

The images of the new concepts are varied, but the reactors themselves are a cheery marigold yellow.

As in Star Trek, the pictures are understandably short on technical details. But it is not really science fiction; they are a visual representation of the research and development work going on right now. These reactors can be built in a factory and delivered on a truck to wherever they are needed using new combinations of fuel and coolants to produce higher heats at lower pressures, yielding more energy in smaller packages, and opening up new applications.

We’ll talk to the engineers about the feasibility of using marigold yellow.

EDITOR’S NOTE: For many years, one of the members of the team at Third Way, Suzy Hobbs Baker, has been in the forefront of advocating that the industry needed to change the way it looked in order to change the way the public felt about nuclear energy.  Watch this TEDx talk she did in 2012 to learn more.

The above is from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...