Oyster Creek Fights Back

In an Aug. 10 article, Asbury Park Press described New Jersey's Oyster Creek Generating Station as "embattled" while reporting on Sen. Jon Corzine's (D-N.J.) comments about the plant:

The Democratic gubernatorial nominee spoke about the embattled plant during a discussion with the Asbury Park Press editorial board.

Corzine, who is running for governor of New Jersey, said Aug. 9 that, if elected governor, he would keep the Oyster Creek nuclear power plant open.

In a letter to the editor published today, Pete Resler, a communications manager at Amergen (a subsidiary of Exelon), admonished the paper for its "use of the pejorative and unattributed term 'embattled'" to describe Oyster Creek:

We are in no way, shape or form "embattled." Oyster Creek is an outstanding example of the 103 U.S. commercial nuclear energy stations, both in terms of safety and reliability, and is widely recognized for it. The majority of residents in Ocean County, in New Jersey and those who live closest to the plant support Oyster Creek continuing to provide safe, clean electricity as long as the station continues to meet all regulatory and safety standards.

The plant brings tremendous environmental and economic benefits to the region, in addition to being a safe source of energy and a significant contributor to U.S. energy independence. Because of a very progressive and transparent regulatory system, our operational data and programs are largely an open book, so there is no mystery about Oyster Creek's day-to-day operations. Few, if any, private industrial facilities can make that statement.

Furthermore, Resler definitely states that the plant is well aware of its priorities:

Asbury Park Press has openly stated it will not cease attacking Oyster Creek until it is permanently shut down. That is your right. But despite broad public support for the station, your newspaper declared war against Oyster Creek, not the other way around. Our efforts are squarely focused on the safe, efficient operation of Oyster Creek. Your newspaper may feel embattled, but we certainly do not.

Comments

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...

Nuclear Utility Moves Up in Credit Ratings, Bank is "Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy"

Some positive signs that nuclear utilities can continue to receive positive ratings even while they finance new nuclear plants for the first time in decades: Wells Fargo upgrades SCANA to Outperform from Market Perform Wells analyst says, "YTD, SCG shares have underperformed the Regulated Electrics (total return +2% vs. +9%). Shares trade at 11.3X our 10E EPS, a modest discount to the peer group median of 11.8X. We view the valuation as attractive given a comparatively constructive regulatory environment and potential for above-average long-term EPS growth prospects ... Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy. SCG plans to participate in the development of two regulated nuclear units at a cost of $6.3B, raising legitimate concerns regarding financing and construction. We have carefully considered the risks and are comfortable with SCG’s strategy based on a highly constructive political & regulatory environment, manageable financing needs stretched out over 10 years, strong partners...

NEI Nuclear Notes

Search This Blog