Natural Gas: Pricier Than You Might Think

Here's Policy Pete on how the rising price of natural gas is affecting U.S. energy markets:

The US energy jones is about to start getting really nasty. The petroleum industry and the government, having totally misunderstood as recently as 2000 what was going to happen to the natural gas supply beginning now, are really panicked. Several dozen crash LNG projects are all on the fast track, being considered by good old FERC on a myopic case by case basis, and pretty soon a growing part of the natural gas 56 million American families use to cook their food and heat their residences will be brought in (at what threatens to be ungodly expense) from the same unstable regions that provide export oil. But unlike oil, where bidding up the price can resolve any short-term supply problems, natural gas dependency is fraught with danger.

For more on the dangers presented by overdependence on natural gas, click here for a speech our CEO, Skip Bowman, gave last April in San Antonio:

Since 1992, when the U.S. last enacted major energy policy legislation, the industry has built approximately 270,000 megawatts of new gas-fired generating capacity.

By contrast, only 14,000 megawatts of new nuclear and coal-fired capacity have entered service. That includes 4,355 megawatts of new nuclear capacity and 9,560 megawatts of new coal, all of it planned and under construction long before 1992.

Coal and nuclear energy together represent approximately 70 percent of U.S. electricity supply. They provide the highest degree of price stability, but investment in new nuclear and coal-fired power plants has virtually disappeared in the last 10 to 15 years.

Instead, we are placing unsustainable demands on natural gas supply, exposing consumers of natural gas and electricity from natural gas to punishing price volatility, and forcing large industrial users of natural gas to move jobs and production offshore because they cannot afford $6 gas as a feedstock.

This is a problem that won't be going away anytime soon.

Technorati tags: Nuclear Energy, Environment, Energy, Politics, Technology, Economics

Comments

Engineer-Poet said…

Over at The Ergosphere, a poster cited an EIA report which projects huge increases in NG-fired electrical generation.

I think the cost of imported LNG is going to put the kibosh on that pronto. It's also going to spur installation of wind farms, because nothing else can offset the need for electrical generation faster than a wind turbine.

Nuclear is long-term and fraught with political difficulties, but I'm sure we're going to have more of it.... eventually. It may take considerable pain before people wake to the reality.

August 1, 2005 at 3:27 PM

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...

How Much Land Does Nuclear, Wind and Solar Really Need?

Not too long ago, we reviewed a report that looked at nuclear energy (and other energy sources) as biodiversity agents. This had to do, in part, with the amount of land a facility needs to function. Nuclear energy and fossil fuel plants use relatively little, wind farms and solar arrays quite a lot of land . Based on an objective and transparent analysis of our sustainable energy choices, we have come to the evidence-based conclusion that nuclear energy is a good option for biodiversity conservation (and society in general) and that other alternatives to fossil fuels should be subjected to the same cost–benefit analyses (in terms of biodiversity and climate outcomes, as well as sociopolitical imperatives) before accepting or dismissing them. Writer Barry Brook, who collected 75 scientists to endorse his paper, is interested in land use as it impacts flora and fauna. Biodiversity concerns do not get as much play as they might – and, when they do, it annoys many when land is withdraw...

NEI Nuclear Notes

Search This Blog