The NEI Afternoon Clip File

Here are some of the news clips we're reading at NEI this afternoon. South Carolina lawmakers are making a strong push to win federal hydrogen-fuel research dollars.

The goal, besides a cleaner environment and less volatile energy markets, is to grow companies around hydrogen-fuel technology, or at least get them to move [to South Carolina].

U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham said he is in a good position to get more hydrogen funding pumped into South Carolina. Graham co-chairs the Senate Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Caucus, a position that helped him tuck $3.5 billion of research money into the energy bill last week.

"What Detroit was to the automotive industry, South Carolina can be to hydrogen," Graham said.

In a July 31 editorial, the Mesabi Daily News hails the Energy Policy Act of 2005 as an important piece of legislation for the entire country, and for the Iron Range in particular:

As a nation we have for far too long been far too dependent on foreign oil. We believe the new energy bill will help the country to loosen that grip a bit. It will do so with more focus on conservation and renewable energy sources, along with merging modern technology to our own vast resources of coal in a much cleaner manner.

From both a national and parochial viewpoint, we are incredibly pleased to see that clean-coal was an important component of the energy bill. This is the country’s most plentiful mineral energy resource and we need to make use of it through modern technology.

We are fortunate on the Iron Range to have a coal gasification project in the works — a project that has now received national attention and is being duplicated in other states.

Come back tomorrow morning for more news from the NEI Clip File.

Technorati tags: Nuclear Energy, Environment, Energy, Politics, Technology, Economics

Comments

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...

How Much Land Does Nuclear, Wind and Solar Really Need?

Not too long ago, we reviewed a report that looked at nuclear energy (and other energy sources) as biodiversity agents. This had to do, in part, with the amount of land a facility needs to function. Nuclear energy and fossil fuel plants use relatively little, wind farms and solar arrays quite a lot of land . Based on an objective and transparent analysis of our sustainable energy choices, we have come to the evidence-based conclusion that nuclear energy is a good option for biodiversity conservation (and society in general) and that other alternatives to fossil fuels should be subjected to the same cost–benefit analyses (in terms of biodiversity and climate outcomes, as well as sociopolitical imperatives) before accepting or dismissing them. Writer Barry Brook, who collected 75 scientists to endorse his paper, is interested in land use as it impacts flora and fauna. Biodiversity concerns do not get as much play as they might – and, when they do, it annoys many when land is withdraw...

NEI Nuclear Notes

Search This Blog