Not too long ago, we reviewed a report that looked at nuclear energy (and other energy sources) as biodiversity agents. This had to do, in part, with the amount of land a facility needs to function. Nuclear energy and fossil fuel plants use relatively little, wind farms and solar arrays quite a lot of land . Based on an objective and transparent analysis of our sustainable energy choices, we have come to the evidence-based conclusion that nuclear energy is a good option for biodiversity conservation (and society in general) and that other alternatives to fossil fuels should be subjected to the same cost–benefit analyses (in terms of biodiversity and climate outcomes, as well as sociopolitical imperatives) before accepting or dismissing them. Writer Barry Brook, who collected 75 scientists to endorse his paper, is interested in land use as it impacts flora and fauna. Biodiversity concerns do not get as much play as they might – and, when they do, it annoys many when land is withdraw...
Comments
IDAHO SAMIZDAT: NUKE NOTES
As someone who has been involved with nuclear and environmental programs in eastern Idaho since 1989, I've chosen to open a news & discussion blog on nuclear energy and nonproliferation topics here http://djysrv.blogspot.com
This blog is a non-commercial effort, independent of affiliation with any government agency, industry firm, lobby or activist organization. I will post on a wide variety of topical news items and will link, whenever possible, to free original sources of information.
Typically, I will be writing about news items with broad public interest. It is not a forum for insider gossip. Comments on blog topics are welcome. Posting will be light usually less than ten items a week.
Please forward this message and blog address to others and link to it from your website or blog if you like what you see.
--
Dan Yurman djysrv@gmail.com http://djysrv.googlepages.com
Mobile 208-521-5726 Map 43N 112W -7 GMT