Cry Havoc and Let Slip the Rains of Gustav

No sooner does Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana open a nuclear fabrication plant in Lake Charles, as noted below, than nature comes a-knocking. A busy man is Governor Jindal. But not only for the state is hurricane Gustav an issue - Entergy has also had its hands full, with almost 900,000 homes and businesses without electricity in the state. This tops the damage done by hurricane Rita in 2005 but does not equal the notorious Katrina of 2006 - which means Entergy has had a miserable time of it, along with gulf coast residents, three of the last four years.

The nuclear news here is that Entergy shut down the River Bend plant in St. Francisville, La., not because the hurricane caused it any difficulties, but because, somewhat ironically, it was chugging away at full power. Because so many transmission lines went down and with them, any kind of demand - plus, as we saw on the news, New Orleanians and others bailed out ahead of the storm, reducing demand further - the plant risked flooding an already unstable grid.

We're thrilled to see that Gustav did not wreck the havoc Katrina did two years ago, though for the people living there, havoc enough. We'll keep an eye open and see how quickly Entergy is able to restore power and get River Bend back on line - they're unfortunately getting to be old hands at this.

We wish our friends at Entergy all the best in sorting out the tangled mess Gustav left them - as we know they are doing the best they know how to for their customers.

Comments

Anonymous said…

Katrina and Rita were both in 2005. It was a not-so-fun time for those of us who were employed by Entergy.

September 3, 2008 at 9:32 AM

Anonymous said…

In fact, Katrina was before Rita. I was in Texas when Rita made landfall, and the Texans were acting like the apocalypse was upon us, the memory of Katrina still fresh in their minds.

September 3, 2008 at 1:38 PM

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...

Fluor Invests in NuScale

You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap...

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

NEI Nuclear Notes

Search This Blog