A "Student Army" on the March for Nuclear Energy in Florida

Jitesh Kuntwala

The following is a guest post from Jitesh A. Kuntawala, a student at the University of Florida. He'll be graduating in 2015 with a Masters degree in nuclear engineering.

As a graduate student in nuclear engineering I recently had the opportunity, along with 8 other nuclear engineering students from the University of Florida, to become active in the public policy side of the nuclear industry.

On May 13, 2014 Florida Governor Rick Scott and his cabinet, sitting in their capacity as the Florida Power Plant Siting Board, held a final hearing for the determination of site selection for the proposed two new reactors to be known as Turkey Point units 6 & 7 at the existing Florida Power and Light (FPL) site near Miami.

We were initially contacted by Jerry Paul of the Energy Information Center (EIC) and invited to attend the hearing. We are thrilled we did. It was a wonderful, engaging, and educational glimpse into some of the decision making bodies behind the nuclear industry. The Governor, Attorney General, Commissioner of Agriculture, and the Chief Financial officer all recognized our group in the audience. The paused the proceedings and called us to the dais for a group photograph were they commended us for our efforts. It was stimulating to see the interactions of opponents and proponents in this public governmental proceeding.

Gov. Scott and the "Student Army."

Our group of nine, including Madison Martin, Patrick Moo, Joseph Cashwell, Logan Blohm, Lucianne Behar, Jonathan Rosales, Nicolas Silva, Hernan Godoy, and myself, proudly stood together at the podium and provided comments in support of new nuclear generation. “Our generation is the future of clean energy and the future of our economy. New nuclear energy supply is essential to both. …Nuclear Energy means jobs. …This is attractive to students who graduate college and look for jobs that can help them get a start (especially those of us who have student loans to pay off!). These nuclear plants represent the future employment of engineers like us.”

Our input seemed to be very well-received by the cabinet and proponents of the new reactors. Following the public comment, the Siting Board voted unanimously to approve the proposed site.

The experience was part of an ongoing EIC initiative (called the “Student Army”) to help our fellow engineering students to become more engaged and visible in the increasingly important public policy debates that affect America’s ability to utilize clean nuclear energy as a reliable supply of electricity. We are hoping to curb the disconnect between policy makers and future engineers and scientists. For example, our group has also provided testimony in Orlando at the NRC hearings for the federal Waste Confidence rulemaking, and in front of the Florida Senate Committee on Communications, Energy, and Public Utilities in favor of Florida’s nuclear cost recovery law.

We hope other engineering students across the country engage in these opportunities. We as nuclear engineering students are studying everyday so that we can be a part of our nation’s safe, reliable, and zero emission energy future. To do so our generation must speak out and be heard.

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...

Nuclear Utility Moves Up in Credit Ratings, Bank is "Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy"

Some positive signs that nuclear utilities can continue to receive positive ratings even while they finance new nuclear plants for the first time in decades: Wells Fargo upgrades SCANA to Outperform from Market Perform Wells analyst says, "YTD, SCG shares have underperformed the Regulated Electrics (total return +2% vs. +9%). Shares trade at 11.3X our 10E EPS, a modest discount to the peer group median of 11.8X. We view the valuation as attractive given a comparatively constructive regulatory environment and potential for above-average long-term EPS growth prospects ... Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy. SCG plans to participate in the development of two regulated nuclear units at a cost of $6.3B, raising legitimate concerns regarding financing and construction. We have carefully considered the risks and are comfortable with SCG’s strategy based on a highly constructive political & regulatory environment, manageable financing needs stretched out over 10 years, strong partners...

NEI Nuclear Notes

Search This Blog