Skip to main content

A "Student Army" on the March for Nuclear Energy in Florida

Jitesh Kuntwala
The following is a guest post from Jitesh A. Kuntawala, a student at the University of Florida. He'll be graduating in 2015 with a Masters degree in nuclear engineering.

As a graduate student in nuclear engineering I recently had the opportunity, along with 8 other nuclear engineering students from the University of Florida, to become active in the public policy side of the nuclear industry.

On May 13, 2014 Florida Governor Rick Scott and his cabinet, sitting in their capacity as the Florida Power Plant Siting Board, held a final hearing for the determination of site selection for the proposed two new reactors to be known as Turkey Point units 6 & 7 at the existing Florida Power and Light (FPL) site near Miami.

We were initially contacted by Jerry Paul of the Energy Information Center (EIC) and invited to attend the hearing. We are thrilled we did. It was a wonderful, engaging, and educational glimpse into some of the decision making bodies behind the nuclear industry. The Governor, Attorney General, Commissioner of Agriculture, and the Chief Financial officer all recognized our group in the audience. The paused the proceedings and called us to the dais for a group photograph were they commended us for our efforts. It was stimulating to see the interactions of opponents and proponents in this public governmental proceeding.

Gov. Scott and the "Student Army."
Our group of nine, including Madison Martin, Patrick Moo, Joseph Cashwell, Logan Blohm, Lucianne Behar, Jonathan Rosales, Nicolas Silva, Hernan Godoy, and myself, proudly stood together at the podium and provided comments in support of new nuclear generation. “Our generation is the future of clean energy and the future of our economy. New nuclear energy supply is essential to both. …Nuclear Energy means jobs. …This is attractive to students who graduate college and look for jobs that can help them get a start (especially those of us who have student loans to pay off!). These nuclear plants represent the future employment of engineers like us.”

Our input seemed to be very well-received by the cabinet and proponents of the new reactors. Following the public comment, the Siting Board voted unanimously to approve the proposed site.

The experience was part of an ongoing EIC initiative (called the “Student Army”) to help our fellow engineering students to become more engaged and visible in the increasingly important public policy debates that affect America’s ability to utilize clean nuclear energy as a reliable supply of electricity. We are hoping to curb the disconnect between policy makers and future engineers and scientists. For example, our group has also provided testimony in Orlando at the NRC hearings for the federal Waste Confidence rulemaking, and in front of the Florida Senate Committee on Communications, Energy, and Public Utilities in favor of Florida’s nuclear cost recovery law.

We hope other engineering students across the country engage in these opportunities. We as nuclear engineering students are studying everyday so that we can be a part of our nation’s safe, reliable, and zero emission energy future. To do so our generation must speak out and be heard.

Comments

Jorge Rodriguez said…
Its great to see so many Gators interested in this innovative technology, and what Florida Power & Light is bringing to the region.

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…

Nuclear Is a Long-Term Investment for Ohio that Will Pay Big

With 50 different state legislative calendars, more than half of them adjourn by June, and those still in session throughout the year usually take a recess in the summer. So springtime is prime time for state legislative activity. In the next few weeks, legislatures are hosting hearings and calling for votes on bills that have been battered back and forth in the capital halls.

On Tuesday, The Ohio Public Utilities Committee hosted its third round of hearings on the Zero Emissions Nuclear Resources Program, House Bill 178, and NEI’s Maria Korsnick testified before a jam-packed room of legislators.


Washingtonians parachuting into state debates can be a tricky platform, but in this case, Maria’s remarks provided national perspective that put the Ohio conundrum into context. At the heart of this debate is the impact nuclear plants have on local jobs and the local economy, and that nuclear assets should be viewed as “long-term investments” for the state. Of course, clean air and electrons …