Skip to main content

NRC RIC is a Must Attend Event

Steven Kraft
The following is a guest post by Steven Kraft, senior technical advisor at the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI).

For 26 years, at the close of each NRC Regulatory Information Conference (RIC), I have blocked my calendar for the following year’s RIC. The RIC (click here for this week’s agenda) has proven to be the most important and most interesting U.S. nuclear conference on the annual calendar and always worth the time invested. Participants learn from all the viewpoints presented. It is refreshing to see the deep technical commitment to safety expressed by all participants regardless of where they stand on any regulatory issue.

Beginning tomorrow morning, the 27th edition of the RIC will bring to together all four NRC Commissioners and over 2,000 attendees in a professional yet convivial atmosphere to openly discuss civilian nuclear regulatory issues in both the formal sessions and informal hallway discussions.

The highlight of the conference is always the commissioners’ addresses. Each commissioner provides personal insights on a topic of current, vital interest. But, it’s not all business, as a tradition has grown that seems to require each commissioner to attempt to outdo his or her colleagues in relating humorous anecdotes. Aside from the lawyer-engineer barbs that get tossed around, Commissioner Ostendorff’s sea stories are not only terrific to hear, he always ties them back to an important learning point for the audience. Speaking at the RIC for the first time as Commissioners are the new Chairman, Steve Burns, and the new commissioner Jeff Baran. Chairman Burns brings the experience of a distinguished career as an attorney both within the NRC and internationally; including three years as the agency’s general counsel. No one knows the NRC better than Chairman Burns.

Commissioner Baran, a highly respected attorney, came to the commission following eleven years in staff positions the U.S. House of Representatives including Staff Director for Energy and Environment for the Democratic staff of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. His political insights are a key addition to the collective knowledge the commission brings to its deliberations.

The RIC chairmanship always falls to the NRC Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. This year, we are eager to hear from Bill Dean, newly appointed to the position from being Region 1 Administrator. Bill’s reputation is that of a strong, fair regulator and a straight shooter.

The RIC never disappoints. Don’t miss it.

Editor’s Note: The NRC will be live streaming this year’s RIC beginning tomorrow (Tuesday) morning at 8:30 a.m. The link for the stream will go live at NRC’s Video Portal. If you don’t want to watch the live stream online, you can follow events at the RIC in real time on Twitter where the NRC has created a special handle just for the conference: @NRCgov_RIC.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fluor Invests in NuScale

You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap

An Ohio School Board Is Working to Save Nuclear Plants

Ohio faces a decision soon about its two nuclear reactors, Davis-Besse and Perry, and on Wednesday, neighbors of one of those plants issued a cry for help. The reactors’ problem is that the price of electricity they sell on the high-voltage grid is depressed, mostly because of a surplus of natural gas. And the reactors do not get any revenue for the other benefits they provide. Some of those benefits are regional – emissions-free electricity, reliability with months of fuel on-site, and diversity in case of problems or price spikes with gas or coal, state and federal payroll taxes, and national economic stimulus as the plants buy fuel, supplies and services. Some of the benefits are highly localized, including employment and property taxes. One locality is already feeling the pinch: Oak Harbor on Lake Erie, home to Davis-Besse. The town has a middle school in a building that is 106 years old, and an elementary school from the 1950s, and on May 2 was scheduled to have a referendu

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin