Obama's Cabinet Picks: EPA Administrator

Politico's Mike Allen reports that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is being "strongly considered" to head the EPA. NBC's Political Director, Chuck Todd, knocked down the story earlier this morning on MSNBC. (Apologies, no transcript or video available.)

Jim Efstathiou at Bloomberg.com is reporting a very different short list,

The names most mentioned by officials at leading U.S. ecology groups include Kathleen McGinty, the former secretary of Pennsylvania's Department of Environmental Protection, Mary Nichols of California's Air Resources Board and Ian Bowles of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. Governor Kathleen Sebelius of Kansas was cited as a "wild card'' choice by a person familiar with transition issues.

Click here for more NNN coverage on who will be in the Obama Cabinet.

Comments

Charles Barton said…

What do you want to bet Obama will pick someone who is widely perceived as a modrate as opposed to an extremist. And Greenpeace howls.

November 6, 2008 at 12:25 PM

Luke said…

There's some speculation in the press that Schwarzenegger could be a contender for energy secretary.

November 9, 2008 at 12:22 AM

Jim Kenney said…

What about former NJ DEP Comissioner Brad Campbell. He is intellegent, strategic and huge asset to environmental protection.

November 20, 2008 at 2:46 PM

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...

Fluor Invests in NuScale

You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap...

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

NEI Nuclear Notes

Search This Blog