Skip to main content

Sovietologist on Climate Progress' Nuclear Critic Joe Romm

This is definitely worth reading!

Comments

Ioannes said…
David,

This has nothing to do with your post, but are you guys aware of the problems with digital I&C that exist at the Finnish new plant site? I really think that digital I&C, software QA and cyber security are going to be the biggest stumbling blocks in new nuclear build. I am actually surprised that this is a problem in Europe, but our regulator is as paranoid about digital I&C, also.

--THERE IS CURRENTLY NO REASON FOR FINNISH REGULATORS TO THINK CONSTRUCTION OF OLKILUOTO-3 will have to be stopped because of delays related to design documentation of automation systems, the head of the Finnish Radiation & Nuclear Safety Authority, Jukka Laaksonen, said in an interview May 7. Laaksonen's comments followed media reports this week of a December 9, 2008 letter from Laaksonen to Areva Chief Executive Anne Lauvergeon. The letter expressed concerns about delays with the systems' design documentation and said that if the problem was not resolved, the project might have to be stopped. Laaksonen said in the interview that the authority "still does not understand the design" of the automation systems, but hopes to have thorough documentation from Areva and Siemens by the end of June. Areva's business unit Areva NP and consortium partner Siemens are building the reactor for utility Teollisuuden Voima Oy. Areva spokeswoman Patricia Marie said May 6 that Areva has already responded to Finnish regulators' concerns about the design delays.

http://newsroom.finland.fi/stt/showarticle.asp?intNWSAID=21621&group=General

UPDATE: Finnish nuclear watchdog warns Areva Olkiluoto site may face shutdown -YLE
6.5.2009 at 13:31(Adds comment from Teollisuuden Voima.)
The Finnish Broadcasting Company (YLE) on Tuesday quoted a letter from the Finnish Nuclear and Radiation Safety Authority (STUK) to Areva as saying that the watchdog might order the Olkiluoto power station building site shut down if the French nuclear group failed to address shortfalls in the facility's automation systems.
YLE further quoted STUK as saying that the design of the automation systems fell short of basic nuclear safety requirements and that the authority therefore did not see any possibility of clearing the systems for installation at the Olkiluoto site.
"Areva NP SAS was to have designed very important systems for safety, but unfortunately, the attitude or lack of professional knowledge of certain individuals who represented the organisation in question at meetings of experts prevent progress in solving the concerns," STUK wrote to Areva, according to the public broadcaster.
The Olkiluoto site has suffered from a string of delays, some to do with safety concerns.
YLE added that there had been no immediate comment from Areva.
A number of Finnish environmental groups said in a joint statement Wednesday that work on the site should be stopped "at once and once and for all"
The Association for Nature Conservation, Friends of the Earth and six other groups added that recurrent reports of quality, control and safety lapses showed that the power station could not be operated safely.
Teollisuuden Voima (TVO), the Finnish utility that ordered the power station, said the site was not under threat of shutdown.
TVO added in a statement that while the planning stage of the station's automation systems had not kept to schedule the company had supplied Areva documents on the systems to STUK for approval.

Popular posts from this blog

Missing the Point about Pennsylvania’s Nuclear Plants

A group that includes oil and gas companies in Pennsylvania released a study on Monday that argues that twenty years ago, planners underestimated the value of nuclear plants in the electricity market. According to the group, that means the state should now let the plants close.

Huh?

The question confronting the state now isn’t what the companies that owned the reactors at the time of de-regulation got or didn’t get. It’s not a question of whether they were profitable in the '80s, '90s and '00s. It’s about now. Business works by looking at the present and making projections about the future.

Is losing the nuclear plants what’s best for the state going forward?

Pennsylvania needs clean air. It needs jobs. And it needs protection against over-reliance on a single fuel source.


What the reactors need is recognition of all the value they provide. The electricity market is depressed, and if electricity is treated as a simple commodity, with no regard for its benefit to clean air o…

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

A Billion Miles Under Nuclear Energy (Updated)

And the winner is…Cassini-Huygens, in triple overtime.

The spaceship conceived in 1982 and launched fifteen years later, will crash into Saturn on September 15, after a mission of 19 years and 355 days, powered by the audacity and technical prowess of scientists and engineers from 17 different countries, and 72 pounds of plutonium.

The mission was so successful that it was extended three times; it was intended to last only until 2008.

Since April, the ship has been continuing to orbit Saturn, swinging through the 1,500-mile gap between the planet and its rings, an area not previously explored. This is a good maneuver for a spaceship nearing the end of its mission, since colliding with a rock could end things early.

Cassini will dive a little deeper and plunge toward Saturn’s surface, where it will transmit data until it burns up in the planet’s atmosphere. The radio signal will arrive here early Friday morning, Eastern time. A NASA video explains.

In the years since Cassini has launc…