Holes at the Elbow

Enthusiastic nuclear energy boosters are a good thing, but nobody’s more enthusiastic than when they have something to sell:

Nuclear is soaring and the sector has the wind at its back. Energy costs are on the rise, nuclear power demand is going to grow, utility stocks are close to recent highs and the economy is no longer expected to slip back into the red. There are several drivers, and several ETFs and major companies that are set to benefit.

ETFs are exchange-traded funds, which is your tip-off that this comes from a stock related site, in this case Investor Place.

Apparently, wild hyperbole is nothing new to stock touts, but it reminds me of when my father took me to Pimlico and a fellow outside the track was pitching a tip sheet containing “ten sure winners.” His jacket had holes at the elbows, but he had ten sure winners.

None of which is to say you shouldn’t invest in energy-related stocks, just that your own research will trump any hyped promises.

---

Presumably, any of the seven emirates that make up the United Arab Emirates can pursue nuclear energy on its own. Most attention up to now has focused on Abu Dhabi, but now Dubai has weighed in:

Dubai will meet 20 per cent of energy needs from nuclear energy and another 20 per cent from clean coal, Saeed Al Tayer, Vice-Chairman of the Supreme Energy Council, said on Wednesday at the launch of Dubai Global Energy Forum 2011.

Dubai has about 2.2 million people within its borders, so I wondered if plans had progressed far enough to determine what kind of plant the country had in mind. But nothing – too soon to tell. Currently, Dubai generates most of its electricity from imported natural gas, so energy security may be playing a part here, too.

Several stories, especially from gulf news sources, made very sure of their adjectives:

Al Tayer said clean coal and peaceful nuclear technology were the main options the Dubai government was considering, in an attempt to diversify energy resources.

And:

[Dubai’s Supreme Council of Energy] is also concerned with the generation and distribution of electricity for public consumption, as well as production of electricity from renewable sources, and generation of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, notably for electricity and desalination plants.

Non-peaceful uses wouldn’t power a light bulb, so “peaceful” here seems code for “not Iran.” Iran’s poor standing could easily discourage other gulf nations from pursuing anything that might be viewed as controversial, but Dubai and fellow UAE emirate Abu Dhabi have not shied away.

These countries need the electricity and they’re in a position to grow their generation while decreasing their carbon footprints – and they aim to do that, at least partially, with nuclear energy.

At Pimlico. It was named after a British pub (Olde Ben Pimlico’s Tavern) when it opened in 1870 in Baltimore. The colt Preakness won the first race held there, hence the modern Preakness Stakes. The 2007 Preakness attracted over 120,000 spectators, the largest crowd for a sporting event in Baltimore history.

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...

NEI Nuclear Notes

Search This Blog