Skip to main content

A Visit from China

Sanmen plant The state visit of Chinese President Hu Jintao to these shores last week proved to be quite consequential in the nuclear sphere:

The Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) today announced the signing of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with China that paves the way for the establishment of a radiation detection training center in Qinhuangdao, China.

The NNSA linked this to its Megaports initiative, which aims to mitigate proliferation concerns by squelching any smuggling of nuclear materials – and that means detecting radiation at ports. Megaports is currently focussed on Shanghai, but you can see a long list of port cities at the link where it has installed detection equipment. Qinhuangdao, where the training center will be, is also a port city, facing the Yellow Sea.

But wait – there’s more:

The Center of Excellence, to be jointly financed [by the U.S. and China], will be a place where technical information can be shared, training courses can be offered, and collaborations can be promoted to “enhance nuclear security in China and throughout Asia,” the White House says. “It will also help meet the training needs for China’s expanding nuclear sector, and promote nuclear security best practices throughout the region.”

No mention of the IAEA, which would seem to have a role here, but it does no harm for China to pick up tips and tricks from the American industry – safety culture and plant security are big topics here. As China starts to expand its nuclear base – we count 24 plants under construction there – the American experience will only help it.

---

But government leaders are not the only ones shaking hands. Westinghouse (and businesses across many different spheres) used Hu’s visit as a way to announce new deals and partnerships in the rising (risen?) economic powerhouse.

Westinghouse Electric Co., a unit of Toshiba Corp., signed a two-year extension of a cooperation agreement with China’s State Nuclear Power Technology Corp. on continued deployment of its third-generation AP1000 reactor.

China’s nuclear plants to date have been built mostly with French and Canadian technology, but Westinghouse’s AP1000 design and technology has proved a big hit.

“AP1000 will account for close to 60 percent of China’s future projects,” said Dave Dai, a Hong Kong-based analyst at Daiwa Securities Capital Markets Co. “AP1000 is also a key stepping stone for China’s goal to create a localized nuclear reactor manufacturing chain.”

That last part sounds like China’s going to do a cheap knock-off, but no. Westinghouse wants to set things up so China can do more of the work on building and supplying parts for the reactors without as much direct involvement with Westinghouse as it has now.

Westinghouse itself noted another deal that has not seen much pick-up in the news:

Westinghouse and China have also announced a series of other cooperative agreements, including a contract also announced today calling for Westinghouse to provide fuel fabrication equipment for the production of AP1000 fuel in Baotou, China. 

And “a nuclear-grade zirconium sponge facility in Jiangsu Province.”

All this sounds like Westinghouse is providing quite an economic boost – for China. I poked around a little bit and found this:

Westinghouse Electric Company has completed preparatory work on fuel for its AP1000 nuclear power plants and manufactured the first four fuel assemblies at the company's Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility (CFFF) in South Carolina.  This fuel will be used at Sanmen Unit 1, located in the Zhejiang Province of China.

So it appears the U.S. is also seeing some stimulative action from Westinghouse’s activities. Good.

Getting started on Sanmen.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...