- Japan's response to the nuclear accident has been exemplary, particularly illustrated by the dedicated, determined and expert staff working under exceptional circumstances;
- Japan's long-term response, including the evacuation of the area around stricken reactors, has been impressive and well organized. A suitable and timely follow-up programme on public and worker exposures and health monitoring would be beneficial;
- The tsunami hazard for several sites was underestimated. Nuclear plant designers and operators should appropriately evaluate and protect against the risks of all natural hazards, and should periodically update those assessments and assessment methodologies;
- Nuclear regulatory systems should address extreme events adequately, including their periodic review, and should ensure that regulatory independence and clarity of roles are preserved; and
- The Japanese accident demonstrates the value of hardened on-site Emergency Response Centres with adequate provisions for handling all necessary emergency roles, including communications.
Worth noting, here’s what the more-detailed report (pdf) said in a sentence by itself on page 3:
To date no health effects have been reported in any person as a result of radiation exposure from the nuclear accident.
There are definitely some good observations from this first cut, look for their final report later this month.
Picture of the IAEA folks at Daiichi from their Flickr page.
Comments
If they only meant members of the public at large they should have explicitly stated that assumption. The public really latches on to any apparent inconsistency and uses it to justify questioning everything the industry says.