Skip to main content

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site:

Japanese Government Reduces Radiation Release Estimate

Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues

• The Japan Nuclear Safety Commission has cut its estimate of radioactive substances released by Fukushima Daiichi between March 12 and April 5 by 10 percent. The new estimate is based on recently released data on radiation levels at monitoring posts and the amount of radioactive material in the air.

• The Japanese government is set to decide on a decontamination plan for the Fukushima prefecture that would cut radiation levels in residential areas by nearly half over two years. Work will include cleaning drainpipes, pruning plants and weeding gardens, washing roofs, removing surface soil, and cleaning the joints in asphalt roads.

• Twelve U.S. nuclear energy facilities declared “unusual events” and one an “alert” following the Tuesday afternoon earthquake centered in Virginia. All twelve facilities have since exited unusual event status. The alert at Virginia’s North Anna facility was called when the magnitude 5.8 temblor cut outside power to the plant. The facility’s two reactors safely shut down. During the outage, diesel generators provided power for reactor cooling and other systems, as they are designed to do. Normal power for the facility has been restored and the alert has been dropped. The facility remains in an unusual event status. An unusual event is the lowest of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s four emergency classifications; an alert is the second-lowest. After earthquakes, safety inspections are conducted by the companies before reactors return to service.

Plant Status

• In an effort to improve effectiveness of reactor cooling operations at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear energy facility, Tokyo Electric Power Co. plans to shift to a different process to cool reactor 3. It will reroute some of the water injection pathway from the feedwater system to the core spray system. This is being done to increase the potential for the core to directly get more coolant.

New Products

• A new interactive graphic on NEI’s Safety First website explains the nuclear fuel cycle, from mining uranium to storing spent fuel.

Media Highlights

• R&D magazine’s online edition discusses a new report from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology on lessons that can be learned from the accident at Fukushima Daiichi. The report is based on analysis of events at the nuclear energy facility by MIT’s Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering.

• The International Atomic Energy Agency will conduct at least one safety inspection in every country with nuclear facilities over the next three years, Reuters reports.

Upcoming Events

• Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will conduct a public meeting at 1 p.m. Aug. 31 to hear comments on the recommendations of the agency’s near-term Japan task force. According the meeting’s agenda, the staff will propose which of the task force recommendations the commission should act on without “unnecessary delay.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...