Skip to main content

Why The Economics Don't Work for Kewaunee Anymore

By Eric McErlain
NEI VP Richard Myers
Over the past 24 hours, we've seen a number of folks online ask the question of why it's no longer economically feasible for Dominion to continue to operate the Kewaunee Power Station in Wisconsin. Earlier today, I put the question to Richard Myers, NEI's Vice President, Policy Development, Planning and Supplier Programs. Here's what he wrote back:
In 2005, when Dominion bought the plant: (1) power prices in the Midwest were in the $40-50/MWhr range; wellhead gas prices were in the $6-10 per million Btu range; and U.S. electricity demand was growing.

Today: (1) power prices in the Midwest are in the $30/MWhr range: gas prices are in the $2-3 per million Btu range; and (3) the U.S. has had 5 years of no growth in electricity demand, thanks to the worst recession in 80 years.
Thanks to Richard for laying out the numbers for us. For a statement from NEI's Marv Fertel on the decision to close Kewaunee, click here. For a a quote from an RBS research note that defended the decision, click here.
Labels:

Comments

SteveK9 said…
None of those 'today' numbers are likely to apply 'tomorrow'.
October 23, 2012 at 2:53 PM
Engineer-Poet said…
There is a shakeout coming in the natural gas industry.  The bubble in shale gas is popping already, and demand is set to surge as heavy trucks start to switch from diesel to LNG.  The breakeven cost of shale gas is around $8/mmBTU, which is where the price will be within a couple of years.  If LNG export terminals open, North American NG prices will likely rise again to within a couple dollars of the world price (currently around $15/mmBTU).

Given this, closing Kewaunee because of the short-term price situation is extremely short-sighted.  I hope some patient capital is willing to buy the plant and keep it open, because it will be well-rewarded in just a few years.
October 23, 2012 at 3:26 PM
Anonymous said…
Still seems short-sighted, apparently ignoring the historical volatility of gas in the context of economic recovery in the US and beyond.
October 23, 2012 at 3:35 PM
Anonymous said…
It seems short-sighted both economically in terms of the historical volatility of NG prices, and also strategically for a robust and diverse mixture of generating assets. There may come a day when NG is in short supply (and therefore expensive) and we will wish we had a zero-emissions source of capacity like Kawuanee. But there is no going back from decommissioning. Once you trash and rip down that asset, it is gone forever.
October 23, 2012 at 5:32 PM
Alex said…
When Dominion bought Kewaunee, I wondered what they were going to do with it. It was part of, I seem to remember, a three plant deal.
Dominion is an East Coast company and they have this plant on the other side of Lake Mchigan.
It would make more sense for another company to take over this plant.
October 24, 2012 at 10:37 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fluor Invests in NuScale

By
You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap
1 comment
Read more

An Ohio School Board Is Working to Save Nuclear Plants

By
Ohio faces a decision soon about its two nuclear reactors, Davis-Besse and Perry, and on Wednesday, neighbors of one of those plants issued a cry for help. The reactors’ problem is that the price of electricity they sell on the high-voltage grid is depressed, mostly because of a surplus of natural gas. And the reactors do not get any revenue for the other benefits they provide. Some of those benefits are regional – emissions-free electricity, reliability with months of fuel on-site, and diversity in case of problems or price spikes with gas or coal, state and federal payroll taxes, and national economic stimulus as the plants buy fuel, supplies and services. Some of the benefits are highly localized, including employment and property taxes. One locality is already feeling the pinch: Oak Harbor on Lake Erie, home to Davis-Besse. The town has a middle school in a building that is 106 years old, and an elementary school from the 1950s, and on May 2 was scheduled to have a referendu
Post a Comment
Read more

Wednesday Update

By
From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin
Post a Comment
Read more