Skip to main content

The 600 and the Economic Benefits of Duane Arnold

Duane_ArnoldOne of the things that nuclear energy plants do well is what factories and plants of all kinds have always done – facilitate a middle class. It’s more complex than that, of course, and we have to deal with the history of unions, the G.I. Bill, entrepreneurship and and a lot else before we get to all the factors that have contributed to the growth and maintenance of a thriving middle class. But let’s just focus on factories, because nuclear facilities are factories of a kind and because a new report focuses on the economic benefits of just one such facility: Iowa’s Duane Arnold Energy Center.

The whole report is worth a look, especially because it’s a quick, comprehensible read with a lot of tables to explore but also because it’s chalk full of good data for nuclear advocates. Duane Arnold, like any nuclear plant, is a virtual city of industry and its economic impacts are broad and comprehensive. Explore the press release and the report itself for lots of nuclear goodness. For this post, let’s zero in on employment At Duane Arnold.

Besides helping to stabilize electricity costs in Iowa, Duane Arnold has contributed significantly to job creation. The plant employs nearly 600 full-time workers, approximately 175 of whom reside within Benton County and nearly 400 within Linn County.

Jobs provided by the plant are also typically higher-paying than most jobs in the area. Full-time Duane Arnold employees who live in Benton County earn, on average, about $75,680 per year. This is substantially higher than the average earnings of workers in the county, which is about $32,060 per year.

Full-time plant employees who live in Linn County earn, on average, about $82,620 per year, compared to the average earnings of workers in the county, which is about $45,690 per year.

Linn County has about 211,00 people in it, largely due to Cedar Rapids and its suburbs. Benton County is more typical of Iowa. It’s about the same size as Linn County but has 26,000 people in it.

Clearly, the Duane Arnold workers are not numerous enough to overwhelm their communities with their presence, but they add considerably to the tax base – especially since many have no doubt bought homes and are raising families – and of course, spend money.

This is attractive to Linn County and likely very attractive to less populous Benton County. The report talks about these economic “ripple” effects, but more in relation to the facility than its workers.

It’s a important concept because it broadens the economic impact beyond just a direct layout of cash for salaries and service.

The economic investment of Duane Arnold in the local community has a multiplier effect across nearly every sector of its economy. While the plant’s direct output value was $200 million, the study found the total impact on the local region was $246 million. That puts the output multiplier at 1.23, so for every dollar of output from Duane Arnold, the local economy produced $1.23.

The report expands this focus to Iowa and the country. It’s all valuable information. For this post, though, I wanted to make sure that one of the most positive social benefits of nuclear energy – and, honestly, of any large industrial endeavor – is not overlooked. That’s the value of those 600 employees – the fact that they live in Linn and Benton Counties out in the middle (well, in the northeast quadrant anyway) of Iowa means that the state has a strong energy profile and is more than doing its part to generate clean electricity.

“Duane Arnold continues to reliably deliver tremendous value for Eastern Iowa and our entire state,” said Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad. “The plant is a key asset as Iowa strives to become more energy independent. I have long been a supporter of the facility and the hundreds of Iowans who work here.”

As well he should be.

And that’s just one plant in one state. Imagine all the multipliers at work across the whole fleet.

I haven’t really seen a cost comparison of different electricity generators in the terms discussed in this report, so it’s sheer gall of me to suggest that the nature of nuclear energy plants make them better and more beneficial participants in the lives of their communities than other sources. I wouldn’t be too upset if solar or coal came out a little better – we’re all friends after all – but let’s be nuclear chauvinists just this once. 

* We like the sound of the 600, but Duane Arnold also brings in about 1500 workers for outages, so the plant can be quite a beehive of activity. The 2100, though, doesn’t have quite the same Spartan ring to it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Knowing What You’ve Got Before It’s Gone in Nuclear Energy

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior director of policy analysis and strategic planning at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

Nuclear energy is by far the largest source of carbon prevention in the United States, but this is a rough time to be in the business of selling electricity due to cheap natural gas and a flood of subsidized renewable energy. Some nuclear plants have closed prematurely, and others likely will follow.
In recent weeks, Exelon and the Omaha Public Power District said that they might close the Clinton, Quad Cities and Fort Calhoun nuclear reactors. As Joni Mitchell’s famous song says, “Don’t it always seem to go that you don’t what you’ve got ‘til it’s gone.”
More than 100 energy and policy experts will gather in a U.S. Senate meeting room on May 19 to talk about how to improve the viability of existing nuclear plants. The event will be webcast, and a link will be available here.
Unlike other energy sources, nuclear power plants get no specia…

Making Clouds for a Living

Donell Banks works at Southern Nuclear’s Plant Vogtle units 3 and 4 as a shift supervisor in Operations, but is in the process of transitioning to his newly appointed role as the daily work controls manager. He has been in the nuclear energy industry for about 11 years.

I love what I do because I have the unique opportunity to help shape the direction and influence the culture for the future of nuclear power in the United States. Every single day presents a new challenge, but I wouldn't have it any other way. As a shift supervisor, I was primarily responsible for managing the development of procedures and programs to support operation of the first new nuclear units in the United States in more than 30 years. As the daily work controls manager, I will be responsible for oversight of the execution and scheduling of daily work to ensure organizational readiness to operate the new units.

I envision a nuclear energy industry that leverages the technology of today to improve efficiency…

Nuclear: Energy for All Political Seasons

The electoral college will soon confirm a surprise election result, Donald Trump. However, in the electricity world, there are fewer surprises – physics and economics will continue to apply, and Republicans and Democrats are going to find a lot to like about nuclear energy over the next four years.

In a Trump administration, the carbon conversation is going to be less prominent. But the nuclear value proposition is still there. We bring steady jobs to rural areas, including in the Rust Belt, which put Donald Trump in office. Nuclear plants keep the surrounding communities vibrant.

We hold down electricity costs for the whole economy. We provide energy diversity, reducing the risk of disruption. We are a critical part of America’s industrial infrastructure, and the importance of infrastructure is something that President-Elect Trump has stressed.

One of our infrastructure challenges is natural gas pipelines, which have gotten more congested as extremely low gas prices have pulled m…