Skip to main content

Ex-Im Bank Keeps Nuclear Supply Chain Bustling in North Carolina

By
Ted Jones of NEI
Ted Jones
The following is a guest post by Ted Jones, Director of International Supplier Relations for NEI.

Certain foes of Ex-Im Bank have claimed that it only benefits a handful of companies, and that no one else would notice if Congress allows its charter to expire on September 30. But the economic impact of Ex-Im Bank is far broader than its ideological foes are willing to admit, extending deep into the supply chains of the larger companies. Many of the Bank’s indirect beneficiaries are unaware of its importance to their business.

To show the indirect impact of Ex-Im Bank, today we are holding a roundtable discussion with business leaders in North Carolina, where a concentration of the U.S. nuclear supply chain represents a vital part of the state and regional economy. A 2013 study conducted by Clemson University valued the direct and indirect impact of the nuclear supply chain in the Carolinas at $20 billion, employing 29,000 people.

Lindsey Crisp, CEO of Carver Machine Works in Washington, North Carolina, had never heard of Ex-Im Bank until eight months ago. “I thought Ex-Im was a satellite radio station,” he admitted.

But Carver, which manufactures pressure vessels for nuclear power plants, had begun selling to international customers. Mr. Crisp learned that U.S. banks must count foreign accounts receivable against a credit line, risking his ability to meet regular expenses like payroll. Ex-Im, he learned, offered a guarantee that freed his working capital.

Then Mr. Crisp learned that one of his major customers, GE Hitachi, needed Ex-Im Bank support just to comply with bidding requirements for international nuclear plant tenders.

Worldwide, 72 nuclear facilities are under construction.

The market for North Carolina’s nuclear supply chain is increasingly international. Only five of the 72 new nuclear power plants under construction worldwide are in the United States. An additional 172 plants are in the licensing and advanced planning stages. Virtually all of them will be built abroad, where the demand for reliable, affordable and clean baseload electricity is growing.

If Congress is serious about creating well-paying American jobs, it must act immediately to reauthorize Ex-Im Bank, one of the most important tools for creating U.S. jobs through exports. Small nuclear suppliers like Carver Machine Works, as well as their larger U.S. and international customers, depend on it.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

By
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
23 comments
Read more

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

By
Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...
7 comments
Read more

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

By
You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...
6 comments
Read more