From Fox News (which can be intensely partisan, but this is by former Senators Evan Bayh (D-Indiana) and Judd Gregg (R-New Hampshire). They have a plan, which I’ve extracted here (read the story for the rest of it):
Before we close more nuclear power plants, we need a national conversation
What might be done to ensure that existing nuclear energy plants are preserved? … [W]e have laid out a framework of possible solutions that might be considered by policymakers.
First, markets should appropriately value existing nuclear energy plants for their reliability…
Second, electric transmission lines could better link nuclear energy plants to the markets that need their power…
Finally, nuclear energy plants could be recognized for the fact that they emit no carbon…
The whole thing is worth a read.
From the Business Standard:
China launches nuclear power expansion scheme
Scheme? Let the evil laughter and overwrought rubbing of hands commence.
They write letters, this one to the Morris County N.J. Daily Record:
Don’t underestimate nuclear power
… So, it’s absurd that EPA’s clean power plant rule assigns scarcely any value to nuclear power’s key role in reducing carbon emissions. The rule as it is currently written is rigged against nuclear power. It counts only 6 percent of a nuclear plant’s generation toward a state’s carbon intensity goal, instead of the plant’s full production of zero-carbon energy.
Well, rigged is a little strong, but it’s pretty right-on. We wrote about nuclear value earlier this week; If Daily Record reader James McGovern dropped by (or read Bayh and Gregg’s editorial), great. If not, still great. Keep writing letters to your local newspaper.
One more headline, from ABC (not the American network):
Business groups want Government to 'get out of the way' of nuclear power
This isn’t from the United States, but I’ll give you a hint: every kangaroo there hates nuclear energy, though they waltz Matilda over the country’s considerable uranium exports.
The peak business group in South Australia, Business SA, is pushing for a debate to be held on the merits of building a nuclear power reactor in the state.
The organization's chief executive, Nigel McBride, has welcomed the comments from senior figures within the Federal Government.
"I do welcome what is, to me, a very important sign from the Prime Minister that this Government is not closed to what could be a significant game-changer in our fight for affordable energy," he said.
We’ve noted Australia’s intense nuclear distaste over several years, so let’s not get our hopes up. But it really is getting stuck with a terrible carbon dioxide emission profile that it can’t seem to find a way to improve. We can think of a way – so has Nigel McBride.