Skip to main content

Critical American Jobs: Vacancies President Trump and the Senate Need to Fill ASAP

When a new president takes office, there is always a lot on the White House’s plate. But recently 93 members of the House of Representatives sent President Trump a letter asking him to move one particular issue higher on the list: picking new members for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, so that body can resume its crucial work of overseeing energy infrastructure.
Vacancies in FERC, NRC, Ex-Im Bank
The members of Congress are correct about that agency, known as FERC, but it is not the only part of government that is short-handed.

FERC is supposed to have five members, but the number had dwindled to three, and recently one of the three quit, so FERC is not able to muster a quorum.

FERC does many jobs. The one most important to the nuclear industry is oversight of the Independent System Operators, the non-profit companies that run the electricity markets and operate the electric grid over most of the country. Those markets have serious problems but, with FERC out of action, proposed reforms will have to wait. So will a variety of other areas controlled by FERC, including approval of new gas pipelines.

The letter was initiated by Tim Walberg, a Michigan Republican who serves on the Energy and Commerce Committee. Greg Walden, Republican of Oregon, the chairman of that committee, and Fred Upton, Republican of Michigan, the chairman of the subcommittee on energy, recently sent a separate letter.

Another five-seat body that is important to the American energy industry, the Export-Import Bank, is nearly paralyzed by its lack of a quorum. Loans over $10 million require a vote by its board, and it has not had a quorum for over a year. American exporters of all kinds, including those who seek to sell nuclear equipment, are competing with overseas companies whose governments can approve loans; ours can’t. Fixing the problem would create high-quality American jobs quickly.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has only three of five commissioner seats filled, and will be down to two at the end of June unless the White House and the Senate act.

If the NRC falls below a quorum of three, the chairperson will function as a single administrator. Other agencies work well that way and the NRC would certainly continue to do a good job, but the public interest is best served by having a commission fully staffed by well-qualified individuals.

Vacancies threaten the government’s continuity of operations. The issue is not really partisan. There is a long-standing formula in place for dividing the seats among members of the majority party and the minority party. But it requires White House action and Senate follow-up.

And it requires time. Nominees must have background checks, and then the Senate votes.

Starting on this soon would be a good idea.

The above is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...