Skip to main content

Energy Diversity Strengthens the United States. How Should We Pay for It?

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the body that sets the rules for the competitive energy markets around the country, will soon take up a proposal from the Department of Energy (DOE) to adjust the pricing system, to ensure the survival of electricity generators that keep at least 90 days of fuel on hand. The department believes the current trend of unusually low power prices is pushing more of these plants, including nuclear reactors, into early retirement, and threatening the power grid’s resiliency and reliability.

At the heart of the DOE’s proposal is the idea that everybody values resilience, but at the moment, nobody pays for it. In the electricity markets today, consumers pay for energy, and they pay for capacity – that is, the ability to make energy when needed. They pay for other services on the grid, like voltage control, that keep the electrons flowing smoothly. But there isn’t a mechanism to pay for resiliency, which the federal government defines as “the ability to withstand and rapidly recover from all hazards.”

Caitlin Durkovich, director at Toffler Associates, on why nuclear is important for energy diversity.

A number of parties submitted comments on the DOE’s proposed changes, and I was one of them. For almost five years, I had the privilege of serving as the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security for Infrastructure Protection. In that role, I was also Chair of the Nuclear Government Coordinating Council and the Co-Chair of the Energy Sector Government Coordinating Council.

In my view, the DOE’s proposed rule is a bold extension of “ongoing government efforts towards securing our critical infrastructure and maintaining resilience of the electric grid.”

Nuclear plants stop to re-fuel once every 18 to 24 months, making them uniquely resistant to disruptions in fuel supply and price fluctuations.

“Changes in fuel supply are an identified risk to the electric subsector while volatile oil and gas prices and demands is a risk inherent to the oil and natural gas sector,’’ I told the Commission. “If the natural gas pipeline system was threatened or disrupted by any sort of national security event, the nation would turn to power sources that were not dependent on the gas delivery system—in this case nuclear, renewables, and coal.”

Recent market trends threaten the economics of nuclear plants and could reduce the diversity of supply. As I wrote, “Redundancy and diversity are fundamental principles of continuity planning, both at the enterprise and the sector level … Diversity in the energy markets is even more critical in the context of increasing geopolitical tensions and a dynamic dangerous threat environment.”

As we consider the method we use to price electricity, we should think about the broader benefits, and the strength that nuclear electricity adds to our system in the longer run.

The above is a guest post by Caitlin Durkovich, director at Toffler Associates. For almost five years, she served as the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security for Infrastructure Protection. In that role, she also was Chair of the Nuclear Government Coordinating Council and the Co-Chair of the Energy Sector Government Coordinating Council.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Ohio School Board Is Working to Save Nuclear Plants

Ohio faces a decision soon about its two nuclear reactors, Davis-Besse and Perry, and on Wednesday, neighbors of one of those plants issued a cry for help. The reactors’ problem is that the price of electricity they sell on the high-voltage grid is depressed, mostly because of a surplus of natural gas. And the reactors do not get any revenue for the other benefits they provide. Some of those benefits are regional – emissions-free electricity, reliability with months of fuel on-site, and diversity in case of problems or price spikes with gas or coal, state and federal payroll taxes, and national economic stimulus as the plants buy fuel, supplies and services. Some of the benefits are highly localized, including employment and property taxes. One locality is already feeling the pinch: Oak Harbor on Lake Erie, home to Davis-Besse. The town has a middle school in a building that is 106 years old, and an elementary school from the 1950s, and on May 2 was scheduled to have a referendu

Why Ex-Im Bank Board Nominations Will Turn the Page on a Dysfunctional Chapter in Washington

In our present era of political discord, could Washington agree to support an agency that creates thousands of American jobs by enabling U.S. companies of all sizes to compete in foreign markets? What if that agency generated nearly billions of dollars more in revenue than the cost of its operations and returned that money – $7 billion over the past two decades – to U.S. taxpayers? In fact, that agency, the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), was reauthorized by a large majority of Congress in 2015. To be sure, the matter was not without controversy. A bipartisan House coalition resorted to a rarely-used parliamentary maneuver in order to force a vote. But when Congress voted, Ex-Im Bank won a supermajority in the House and a large majority in the Senate. For almost two years, however, Ex-Im Bank has been unable to function fully because a single Senate committee chairman prevented the confirmation of nominees to its Board of Directors. Without a quorum

NEI Praises Connecticut Action in Support of Nuclear Energy

Earlier this week, Connecticut Gov. Dannel P. Malloy signed SB-1501 into law, legislation that puts nuclear energy on an equal footing with other non-emitting sources of energy in the state’s electricity marketplace. “Gov. Malloy and the state legislature deserve praise for their decision to support Dominion’s Millstone Power Station and the 1,500 Connecticut residents who work there," said NEI President and CEO Maria Korsnick. "By opening the door to Millstone having equal access to auctions open to other non-emitting sources of electricity, the state will help preserve $1.5 billion in economic activity, grid resiliency and reliability, and clean air that all residents of the state can enjoy," Korsnick said. Millstone Power Station Korsnick continued, "Connecticut is the third state to re-balance its electricity marketplace, joining New York and Illinois, which took their own legislative paths to preserving nuclear power plants in 2016. Now attention should