Skip to main content

A Design Team Pictures the Future of Nuclear Energy

For more than 100 years, the shape and location of human settlements has been defined in large part by energy and water. Cities grew up near natural resources like hydropower, and near water for agricultural, industrial and household use.

So what would the world look like with a new generation of small nuclear reactors that could provide abundant, clean energy for electricity, water pumping and desalination and industrial processes?

Hard to say with precision, but Third Way, the non-partisan think tank, asked the design team at the Washington, D.C. office of Gensler & Associates, an architecture and interior design firm that specializes in sustainable projects like a complex that houses the NFL’s Dallas Cowboys. The talented designers saw a blooming desert and a cozy arctic village, an old urban mill re-purposed as an energy producer, a data center that integrates solar panels on its sprawling flat roofs, a naval base and a humming transit hub.

In the converted mill, high temperature reactors nestle inside an old brick building evocative of the old warehouse beyond the outfield wall at Baltimore’s Camden Yards, providing high-temperature steam for various industrial processes, replacing fossil fuels that emit carbon dioxide when burned.

At the naval base, ships and submarines in port are “cold ironing,” meaning they draw their electricity from shore. Ports in areas with air pollution problems already practice “cold ironing,” although this usually means connecting ships to a power grid that runs at least in part on fossil fuels. (Land-based generators pollute, but less than ships’ engines do.) In this vision, the necessary energy comes from a row of small reactors near the wharf. And in an emergency, the reactors can help power the surrounding city.

In the desert oasis, a nuclear reactor built to power a city a few miles away also provides energy for cleaning up water from a brackish aquifer. That allows lush surroundings in the midst of barren hills.



In the transit hub, the reactors can charge electric cars, autonomous taxis, and buses, along with a high speed train.

In the arctic, far from the power grid, a small reactor has replaced the diesel oil that was previously shipped in by truck, barge or even by airplane, all of which costs money and energy. Wind turbines are integrated into the grid, which is isolated but powerful.

And at the data farm, six modular reactors are humming along, with space left for four more, as requirements grow.

One of the forces behind the designs, Suzy Hobbs Baker, a communications advisor at Third Way, said that she had always wanted to add public art to existing nuclear sites, because not everybody likes huge masses of bare concrete. But painting the exterior of an operating reactor can be complicated, she said. She has, however, worked up two designs: a pattern like a double-helix DNA strand for cooling towers and a reactor containment and cooling tower painted like an impressionistic view of the sea, a hint at part of the environment that reactors preserve.

For a new reactor, she said, she’d like to have the aesthetics “baked in from the get-go.”

The images of the new concepts are varied, but the reactors themselves are a cheery marigold yellow.

As in Star Trek, the pictures are understandably short on technical details. But it is not really science fiction; they are a visual representation of the research and development work going on right now. These reactors can be built in a factory and delivered on a truck to wherever they are needed using new combinations of fuel and coolants to produce higher heats at lower pressures, yielding more energy in smaller packages, and opening up new applications.

We’ll talk to the engineers about the feasibility of using marigold yellow.

EDITOR’S NOTE: For many years, one of the members of the team at Third Way, Suzy Hobbs Baker, has been in the forefront of advocating that the industry needed to change the way it looked in order to change the way the public felt about nuclear energy.  Watch this TEDx talk she did in 2012 to learn more.

The above is from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Billion Miles Under Nuclear Energy (Updated)

And the winner is…Cassini-Huygens, in triple overtime.

The spaceship conceived in 1982 and launched fifteen years later, will crash into Saturn on September 15, after a mission of 19 years and 355 days, powered by the audacity and technical prowess of scientists and engineers from 17 different countries, and 72 pounds of plutonium.

The mission was so successful that it was extended three times; it was intended to last only until 2008.

Since April, the ship has been continuing to orbit Saturn, swinging through the 1,500-mile gap between the planet and its rings, an area not previously explored. This is a good maneuver for a spaceship nearing the end of its mission, since colliding with a rock could end things early.

Cassini will dive a little deeper and plunge toward Saturn’s surface, where it will transmit data until it burns up in the planet’s atmosphere. The radio signal will arrive here early Friday morning, Eastern time. A NASA video explains.

In the years since Cassini has launc…

Missing the Point about Pennsylvania’s Nuclear Plants

A group that includes oil and gas companies in Pennsylvania released a study on Monday that argues that twenty years ago, planners underestimated the value of nuclear plants in the electricity market. According to the group, that means the state should now let the plants close.

Huh?

The question confronting the state now isn’t what the companies that owned the reactors at the time of de-regulation got or didn’t get. It’s not a question of whether they were profitable in the '80s, '90s and '00s. It’s about now. Business works by looking at the present and making projections about the future.

Is losing the nuclear plants what’s best for the state going forward?

Pennsylvania needs clean air. It needs jobs. And it needs protection against over-reliance on a single fuel source.


What the reactors need is recognition of all the value they provide. The electricity market is depressed, and if electricity is treated as a simple commodity, with no regard for its benefit to clean air o…

Why Nuclear Plant Closures Are a Crisis for Small Town USA

Nuclear plants occupy an unusual spot in the towns where they operate: integral but so much in the background that they may seem almost invisible. But when they close, it can be like the earth shifting underfoot.

Lohud.com, the Gannett newspaper that covers the Lower Hudson Valley in New York, took a look around at the experience of towns where reactors have closed, because the Indian Point reactors in Buchanan are scheduled to be shut down under an agreement with Gov. Mario Cuomo.


From sea to shining sea, it was dismal. It wasn’t just the plant employees who were hurt. The losses of hundreds of jobs, tens of millions of dollars in payrolls and millions in property taxes depressed whole towns and surrounding areas. For example:

Vernon, Vermont, home to Vermont Yankee for more than 40 years, had to cut its municipal budget in half. The town closed its police department and let the county take over; the youth sports teams lost their volunteer coaches, and Vernon Elementary School lost th…