Skip to main content

A few observations - North Anna Env. Impact Hearing

Last week I had the pleasure of attending my first public meeting dealing with nuclear power. As some you may already know, Dominion Power, has applied to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to possibly build another reactor at their North Anna reactor site. While I have been to many public meetings in the past, I have never seen anything like this before.

North Anna Nuclear Power Station is located on a man-made lake called Lake Anna. When the NRC finally approved this site for a reactor they created a cooling lake by constructing a dam on a local river. Today Lake Anna is a playground for Virginia, homes and businesses have sprouted around the lake creating a sustained community around the plant. Like many other reactors in the United States, many of those who work at North Anna live in the surrounding community.

When the meeting began, I tried to take notes on every speaker with the hopes of actually answering every concern and question but this is just not feasible. Instead I decided to take the words directly from opponents of North Anna and use a few points made by North Anna supporters to answer these issues.

Public Citizen, PACE, NIRS, Greenpeace, Charlottesville Center for Peace and Justice and the Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League all showed up for this meeting. Before the meeting even started, they held a rally in the school cafeteria to answer questions from the local community. All had key issues that they attempted to highlight, included in this:

  1. Increased lake temperature threatens the striped bass population in the lake.
  2. Increased water withdrawal endangers aquatic life in the lake.
  3. Decreased flow downstream of the dam threatens aquatic habitat.
I would like to take a few points from a gentleman who spoke on this topic. His name is Delbert Horn.

"I read on Public Citizen’s web site, that higher water temperatures will threaten the Striped Bass population in the
Lake. I was curious, so I read the Environmental Impact Statement. I learned the Dept. of Game and Inland Fisheries introduced Striped Bass to Lake Anna, and they have to restock 100 – 200,000 Striped Bass every year, at considerable expense, because the creeks and river that feed the lake just aren’t deep enough, and fast enough for spawning runs. "

You see, without spawning runs, a self-sustaining Striped Bass population just isn’t possible… regardless of Lake temperature.What’s interesting, though, is that Public Citizen, a government watchdog group, isn’t blowing the whistle on the State Government for supporting an artificial Striped Bass population. Instead, they filed a legal contention that Dominion will make the lake “less comfortable” for the 100 – 200,000 Striped Bass the State dumps into Lake Anna every year."

Mr. Horn went on to question a few points made by Lou Zeller, of the Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League, that the death rates of children doubled post-start up of North Anna. (editorial note - this was probably the most confrontational portion of the meeting) Mr. Horn stated the following:

"[Zeller] claims the data suggests these children were harmed by radioactive emissions from the plant. Mr. Zeller referenced the CDC website as his data source, so I went online myself to check out his numbers … and I encourage all of you to do the same."

"While the Blue Ridge website says their death statistics exclude accidents, homicides, and suicides, what I saw at CDC.gov proved otherwise (Louisa County). Zeller’s “Before” numbers did correctly exclude accidents, but his “After” numbers did not exclude them. This is how Zeller’s death rates are made to “almost double.”

While Mr. Horn was not the only pro-nuclear resident in the audience it was obvious that he was one of the few that actually brought something other than talking points to the meeting. When Mr. Zeller took the dais to rebutt the points made by Mr. Horn, he stuck with the same contention regarding the striped bass population, completely leaving out his contentions about the dangers of North Anna. It makes you wonder if this "environmental movement" can actually back up the claims that they have made for years about the safety and environmental impact of nuclear power.

I have more to post on this meeting, but I want to thank Mr. Horn for sending me his speech.

**UPDATE** In the interest of full disclosure, Mr. Horn is a Dominion employee. He made the statement not as a Dominion employee, but as a citizen interested in the issue.

Comments

Paul Swinburne said…
I worked on construction of the North Anna plant during the mid 1970's. The site and original design was for 4 reactors but because of economic conditions resulting from the first oil embargo only 2 units were completed. Thus the cooling lagoon and many other site facilities were designed for 4 units and thus there is capacity for additional unit(s).
PeterK said…
I am a friend of Delbert Horn and aplaud his efforts to support Nuclear Power. His example shows how careful checking of facts can often derail the environmentalists who feed of fear an public misunderstandings. When the facts are known Nuclear Energy is a clean and reliable source of energy which our county should take advantage.

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Missing the Point about Pennsylvania’s Nuclear Plants

A group that includes oil and gas companies in Pennsylvania released a study on Monday that argues that twenty years ago, planners underestimated the value of nuclear plants in the electricity market. According to the group, that means the state should now let the plants close.

Huh?

The question confronting the state now isn’t what the companies that owned the reactors at the time of de-regulation got or didn’t get. It’s not a question of whether they were profitable in the '80s, '90s and '00s. It’s about now. Business works by looking at the present and making projections about the future.

Is losing the nuclear plants what’s best for the state going forward?

Pennsylvania needs clean air. It needs jobs. And it needs protection against over-reliance on a single fuel source.


What the reactors need is recognition of all the value they provide. The electricity market is depressed, and if electricity is treated as a simple commodity, with no regard for its benefit to clean air o…

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…