Skip to main content

Coal Supply Disruption Threatens Operations at North Dakota Plant

News release from the Basin Electric Power Cooperative:
Bismarck, N.D. – Curtailment plans are being formulated at Missouri Basin Power Project’s Laramie River Station in Wheatland, Wyo., because the rail transportation system has not been delivering the fuel required to keep the plant operating at full production. Since May of 2005 deliveries out of the Powder River Basin to all utilities have been highly sporadic.

Basin Electric Power Cooperative is the operator of and part owner of Laramie River Station. Ron Harper, Basin Electric’s CEO and general manager, said “the reduced rail deliveries aren't a result of a lack of supply or ability to produce coal in the Powder River Basin; it’s simply a lack of rail transportation of coal to Laramie River Station. We are concerned about a decline in service and efficiency.”

Maintaining full generation levels at the 1,650 megawatt, three-unit station requires 24,000 tons of coal per day, which is what BNSF Railway is normally scheduled to deliver. Just to match daily consumption, LRS needs the equivalent of one-and-a-half trains per day. (A train consists of about 136 rail cars, each carrying about 120 tons of coal.) In addition, a stockpile is maintained at the plant site, which is used as backup in case of an interruption in rail deliveries. Today, the stockpile contains less than six days of operation at full production.

“In order to conserve our stockpile and maintain at least some production at the station, we are currently determining how to reduce production levels in the event curtailment becomes necessary,” Harper said. “Even though there’s enough demand for all three units to operate at full capacity, we want to conserve coal to be able to perform during a severe cold snap, for example. We are doing everything we can to continue full production, including adding a fourth train set and purchasing coal from mines closer to the plant to reduce transportation cycle times.”

If the stockpile is depleted further, the project will be forced to implement a 20 percent generation curtailment to preclude the possibility of reaching total coal exhaustion, which would shut the entire project down. A total plant shutdown may result in significant economic and reliability impacts to the region.

Laramie River Station is owned by the Missouri Basin Power Project, a consortium of consumer-owned electric utilities. Participants include Basin Electric Power Cooperative, Bismarck, N.D.; Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Denver, Colo.; Missouri River Energy Services, Sioux Falls, S.D.; the Lincoln Electric System, Lincoln, Neb.; the Heartland Consumers Power District, Madison, S.D.; and the Wyoming Municipal Power Agency, Lusk, Wyo.

Technorati tags: , , ,


Starvid, Sweden said…

I figure you are all sitting at your computers faintly smiling and thinking "One and a half 136 car trains full of uranium fuel rods do last quite longer than a single day."

Well, so am I. ;)

It seems the god of railroads sends swift retribution to the burners of fossil fuels. ;)

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…

Nuclear Is a Long-Term Investment for Ohio that Will Pay Big

With 50 different state legislative calendars, more than half of them adjourn by June, and those still in session throughout the year usually take a recess in the summer. So springtime is prime time for state legislative activity. In the next few weeks, legislatures are hosting hearings and calling for votes on bills that have been battered back and forth in the capital halls.

On Tuesday, The Ohio Public Utilities Committee hosted its third round of hearings on the Zero Emissions Nuclear Resources Program, House Bill 178, and NEI’s Maria Korsnick testified before a jam-packed room of legislators.

Washingtonians parachuting into state debates can be a tricky platform, but in this case, Maria’s remarks provided national perspective that put the Ohio conundrum into context. At the heart of this debate is the impact nuclear plants have on local jobs and the local economy, and that nuclear assets should be viewed as “long-term investments” for the state. Of course, clean air and electrons …