Skip to main content

Coal Supply Disruption Threatens Operations at North Dakota Plant

By Eric McErlain
News release from the Basin Electric Power Cooperative:
Bismarck, N.D. – Curtailment plans are being formulated at Missouri Basin Power Project’s Laramie River Station in Wheatland, Wyo., because the rail transportation system has not been delivering the fuel required to keep the plant operating at full production. Since May of 2005 deliveries out of the Powder River Basin to all utilities have been highly sporadic.

Basin Electric Power Cooperative is the operator of and part owner of Laramie River Station. Ron Harper, Basin Electric’s CEO and general manager, said “the reduced rail deliveries aren't a result of a lack of supply or ability to produce coal in the Powder River Basin; it’s simply a lack of rail transportation of coal to Laramie River Station. We are concerned about a decline in service and efficiency.”

Maintaining full generation levels at the 1,650 megawatt, three-unit station requires 24,000 tons of coal per day, which is what BNSF Railway is normally scheduled to deliver. Just to match daily consumption, LRS needs the equivalent of one-and-a-half trains per day. (A train consists of about 136 rail cars, each carrying about 120 tons of coal.) In addition, a stockpile is maintained at the plant site, which is used as backup in case of an interruption in rail deliveries. Today, the stockpile contains less than six days of operation at full production.

“In order to conserve our stockpile and maintain at least some production at the station, we are currently determining how to reduce production levels in the event curtailment becomes necessary,” Harper said. “Even though there’s enough demand for all three units to operate at full capacity, we want to conserve coal to be able to perform during a severe cold snap, for example. We are doing everything we can to continue full production, including adding a fourth train set and purchasing coal from mines closer to the plant to reduce transportation cycle times.”

If the stockpile is depleted further, the project will be forced to implement a 20 percent generation curtailment to preclude the possibility of reaching total coal exhaustion, which would shut the entire project down. A total plant shutdown may result in significant economic and reliability impacts to the region.

Laramie River Station is owned by the Missouri Basin Power Project, a consortium of consumer-owned electric utilities. Participants include Basin Electric Power Cooperative, Bismarck, N.D.; Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Denver, Colo.; Missouri River Energy Services, Sioux Falls, S.D.; the Lincoln Electric System, Lincoln, Neb.; the Heartland Consumers Power District, Madison, S.D.; and the Wyoming Municipal Power Agency, Lusk, Wyo.
Interesting.

Technorati tags: , , ,

Comments

Anonymous said…
"Interesting."

I figure you are all sitting at your computers faintly smiling and thinking "One and a half 136 car trains full of uranium fuel rods do last quite longer than a single day."

Well, so am I. ;)

It seems the god of railroads sends swift retribution to the burners of fossil fuels. ;)
March 7, 2006 at 12:21 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

By
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
23 comments
Read more

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

By
You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...
6 comments
Read more

How Much Land Does Nuclear, Wind and Solar Really Need?

By
Not too long ago, we reviewed a report that looked at nuclear energy (and other energy sources) as biodiversity agents. This had to do, in part, with the amount of land a facility needs to function. Nuclear energy and fossil fuel plants use relatively little, wind farms and solar arrays quite a lot of land . Based on an objective and transparent analysis of our sustainable energy choices, we have come to the evidence-based conclusion that nuclear energy is a good option for biodiversity conservation (and society in general) and that other alternatives to fossil fuels should be subjected to the same cost–benefit analyses (in terms of biodiversity and climate outcomes, as well as sociopolitical imperatives) before accepting or dismissing them. Writer Barry Brook, who collected 75 scientists to endorse his paper, is interested in land use as it impacts flora and fauna. Biodiversity concerns do not get as much play as they might – and, when they do, it annoys many when land is withdraw...
4 comments
Read more