Skip to main content

French Nuclear Phase-Out?

France's anti-nuclear group Sortir du Nucleaire claims the country can phase-out all of its nuclear plants in five to ten years (in French). Here is World Nuclear News' take:
The pressure group's recently published 100-page report, Nucleaire: Comment en sortir?, presents a highly detailed plan of far-reaching energy saving measures that it says could enable the country that famously relies on nuclear power plants for 78% of its electricity to close them all down. It then advocates an energy efficient vision of France which uses other generation options - including fossil fuels.

The group's vision of electricity generation in a nuclear-free France relies chiefly on wind power, with aims to build 11.8 GWe of terrestrial wind power and 10 GWe of maritime wind power facilities in five years, rising to 24.3 GWe and 15 GWe respectively in ten years. At present France has only 2 GWe of wind powered generation, although the report points to Germany's current example of a wind fleet with the capacity to generate 20 GWe.
I am pretty sure 39.3 GWe of wind will not replace France's 63 GWe nuclear fleet. More:
The burden of saving energy would have to fall heavily on French businesses and the public. The report suggests measures to replace incandescent lightbulbs, refrigerators and freezers with energy-efficient models, reduce the amount of energy wasted by electrical appliances left on standby, and fixing a maximum energy ceiling for industrial processes using electricity. It also calls for an end to the use of electricity for space and water heating, the prohibition of air conditioning in private homes and the imposition of a 19 degree C limit for room heating.

This might be regarded as "a loss of comfort and quality of life" in some quarters, says the report, "but we bet that if this relative discomfort eventually allowed [France] to leave nuclear then this [would] appear much more bearable."
Well at least the anti-nuclear group is being honest about a diminished quality of life without nuclear. I doubt the French citizens will go for it though.

Comments

bw said…
The talk of banning air conditioning is interesting, considering that 14,802 people, mostly elderly, died in France from heat in 2003.

Apparently these environmentalists in France want to get rid of all of their pesky elderly.
Matthew66 said…
Given the importance of Areva and EDF to the French economy this has zero chance of happening. Added to this, the French government has a social security liability that, as a percentage of GDP, dwarfs even the USA's social security liabilty. The French union movement is very militant, and very pro nuclear, especially considering the jobs it creates. If there were even a hint of anything like this getting a reading in Parliament, there would be riots on the streets of Paris.
Anonymous said…
So much for the anti-nukes being pro-life!
bryfry said…
It's easier that way. Just think of the social security savings! You can take all of the money saved from not paying dead retirees and spend it on wind turbines.

I predict that sortir du nucléaire will soon start selling Soylant Green in a "bake sale" fashion to raise money. Why not kill two birds (or two old people, as the case may be) with one stone?
Anonymous said…
Population reduction, forced or not, is often at the heart of some of these leftist philosophies and policies. For all of their faux concern for "the poor" and "the needy", they are, at heart, social Darwinists.
DV8 2XL said…
Given that the average French citizen is very proud of the fact that France is a world leader in nuclear energy, I don't see this getting much traction with the public over there.

I mean think about it a Frenchman giving up something that they best the British, Americans and Germans at. Unthinkable!
Stephen said…
France phase out nuclear? France has benefited massively from their nuclear energy program. They're EXPORTING power. They don't have to resort to economically crippling energy rationing. While other countries are wondering how they could reign in hydrogen power or plug in hybrids, France sits back because they're all set for them.

Sure, they could ditch nuclear energy. All they'd have to do is cut back... a HUGE amount. They could also live in mud huts. They could also give up antibiotics and vaccines and telecommunications.

Why the hell would they want to? Nuclear has served them well. They made a very wise decision a while ago and have stuck with it. With the US had done the same..
Gunter said…
Greetings,

Perhaps you all missed it but a recent report in the French newspaper Les Echos quotes Dominque Miallard, chairman of French grid management as saying that EDF is being forced "to import record levels of electricity" due to prolonged outages as the result of technical problems at French reactors. You know when you have a problem at a French reactor is usually winds up a generic industry problem affecting large sections of the fleet. 16% of the n-industry went off line.

As a consequence in October, France increased its imports of power by 143% and reduced its exports by 21%, and "the scenario is likely to repeat itself often this winter," according to Les Echos.

BTW, I was just up in Alberta for a week where the public is effectively mobilizing against AREVA efforts to nuclear power the petroleum industry up there on the tar sands. Really dirty business.
So much for that "Clean Air" motto.
Just more of the same CON (coal, oil, nuclear) job.

Popular posts from this blog

Making Clouds for a Living

Donell Banks works at Southern Nuclear’s Plant Vogtle units 3 and 4 as a shift supervisor in Operations, but is in the process of transitioning to his newly appointed role as the daily work controls manager. He has been in the nuclear energy industry for about 11 years.

I love what I do because I have the unique opportunity to help shape the direction and influence the culture for the future of nuclear power in the United States. Every single day presents a new challenge, but I wouldn't have it any other way. As a shift supervisor, I was primarily responsible for managing the development of procedures and programs to support operation of the first new nuclear units in the United States in more than 30 years. As the daily work controls manager, I will be responsible for oversight of the execution and scheduling of daily work to ensure organizational readiness to operate the new units.

I envision a nuclear energy industry that leverages the technology of today to improve efficiency…

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…

Nuclear: Energy for All Political Seasons

The electoral college will soon confirm a surprise election result, Donald Trump. However, in the electricity world, there are fewer surprises – physics and economics will continue to apply, and Republicans and Democrats are going to find a lot to like about nuclear energy over the next four years.

In a Trump administration, the carbon conversation is going to be less prominent. But the nuclear value proposition is still there. We bring steady jobs to rural areas, including in the Rust Belt, which put Donald Trump in office. Nuclear plants keep the surrounding communities vibrant.

We hold down electricity costs for the whole economy. We provide energy diversity, reducing the risk of disruption. We are a critical part of America’s industrial infrastructure, and the importance of infrastructure is something that President-Elect Trump has stressed.

One of our infrastructure challenges is natural gas pipelines, which have gotten more congested as extremely low gas prices have pulled m…