Skip to main content

Callaway Nuclear Plant Achieves First Breaker to Breaker Run

By
Well done!:
AmerenUE’s Callaway Nuclear Plant has achieved its first so-called "breaker-to-breaker run" after operating for 520 days without going out of service, according to a statement released by the St. Louis-based utility.

A breaker-to-breaker run is when a plant operates from one refueling to the next without going out of service. The plant is refueled every 18 months and must go offline during refueling.

...

The 1,190-megawatt plant generated 16 million megawatt hours of electricity - enough to power on average more than 857,000 households.
Welcome to the club.
Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
Extremely impressive performance! Congratulations to the operations team!
October 16, 2008 at 10:43 AM
Anonymous said…
I took 24 hours/day times 520 days times 1190 MWatts and got 14.8 MWhours. Does this plant run over capacity or do they have longer days?
October 16, 2008 at 5:09 PM
Anonymous said…
In response to anonymous, the difference is due to the fact that the 1,090 MW figure is "net" capacity, which excludes power used to run the plant itself. The plant's "gross" capacity is 1,300 MW, and the 16 million MWH generated over the 520 day period was gross generation. In listing the capacity of each of its power plants, AmerenUE normally uses net capacity, so in describing Callaway as a 1,090 MW plant in its news release it used the net figure to be consistent with company fact sheets and other materials.
October 17, 2008 at 2:01 PM
Anonymous said…
In my response, I meant to say 1,190 MW--not 1,090 MW.
October 17, 2008 at 3:12 PM
Rod Adams said…
It is also possible to safely operate a steam plant at greater than 100% of rated electrical power capacity under certain environmental conditions.

If, for example, the cooling water runs several degrees colder than the design conditions, the electrical power output will increase without increasing reactor power. Rankine cycle efficiency is improved with lower heat sink temperatures.

We used to make sure to find some nice cold water when proving we could make "rated turns".
October 18, 2008 at 4:11 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

By
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
23 comments
Read more

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

By
Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...
7 comments
Read more

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

By
You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...
6 comments
Read more