Skip to main content

Serious Topics, Dry Wit

By
In a comprehensive, fascinating interview Thursday in sunny Idaho Falls with Idaho Samizdat, Dr. Dale Klein, longtime NRC commissioner and its onetime chairman, discussed rabbits in the context of public communication, cheeses, small reactors, Yucca Mountain, bozos, Blackberries, and business.

Serious quote:
The U.S. has difficulty thinking clearly about how to make long-term capital commitments. The financing profile for a new nuclear reactor is now 60-80 years. Our grandchildren will benefit from them and some will operate them.
Witty ones:
In response to a question at the lunch meeting about the reason France has such a strong commitment to nuclear energy, he quipped, ‘That nation's energy polices come down to just four factors: no oil, no gas, no coal, and no choice.’
and
Klein is frustrated by people who have already made up their minds about the license application. Referring to the massive electronic document library that supports the project, he said ironically, "anyone who says Yucca Mountain is unsafe must be a speed reader."
Labels:

Comments

Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus said…
So why did Obamolech demote pro-nuclear Dale Klein and promote anti-nuclear Jackzo? Remember, NEI, you were the guys who wanted Harry Reid's Jackzo balanced out by Pete Domineci's Peter Lyons when Bush was forced to compromise with the devil. Now Lyons is gone, and nothing stands in the way of over-regulating the industry until new nukes are too expensive to build.

McCain wanted to build 40 new nukes rightaway. Instead we got cash for clunkers from Obamessiah.
September 28, 2009 at 12:14 PM
David Bradish said…
Fact 1: It is customary for Chairmen of federal agencies to be from the same party that's in office. Thus, the reason for the switch to Jaczko. The fact that it took five months before the commissioners switched was a sign that Obama was fine with a Republican running the NRC for a bit.

Fact 2: The two nominees to the NRC (by the Obama Administration) are pro-nuclear and "welcomed by the industry."

Fact 3: Obama gave us cash clunkers, he also gave us Secretary Chu. Check out what Chu said last week.

Like I asked several months ago, how about we get you on board with trying to educate the Democrats on the benefits of nuclear so we could bring them on our side instead of always complaining about them?
September 28, 2009 at 12:55 PM
Anonymous said…
"McCain wanted to build 40 new nukes rightaway."

With their containment structures magically formed for free from the hot air of his stump speeches, no doubt.

Talk is cheap, especially when it's campaign rhetoric.

What's stopping SENATOR McCain from proposing legislation to do exactly this, if he's TRULY so committed to it?
September 28, 2009 at 2:56 PM
Unknown said…
Unfortunately, loannes is more motivated by his political beliefs not relating to nuclear power to the point where he smears Obama on nuclear power to convince others to be anti-Obama.

This is just an example on how nuclear power is a victim of the polarization of our Country.
September 28, 2009 at 5:17 PM
D Kosloff said…
Anonymous,

How much power do you think that McCain has in a Senate of 99 with 59 Democrats?
September 29, 2009 at 9:49 AM
Anonymous said…
"How much power do you think that McCain has in a Senate of 99 with 59 Democrats?"

First, you're inaccurately assuming that all Democratic MoCs are anti-nuclear power. In fact, the Democratic House whip, Jim Clyburn, is heading up a rather large coalition of pronuclear Dems to support new nuclear. Gotta read the news occasionally, rather than relying on political prejudices.

Second, McCain, to my knowledge, never introduced legislation to build NPPs, let alone 40-100, even before the Democratic majority controlled Congress. Only time he got that religion was when he needed it for his presidential campaign.
September 29, 2009 at 11:39 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fluor Invests in NuScale

By
You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap...
1 comment
Read more

Wednesday Update

By
From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nuclear Utility Moves Up in Credit Ratings, Bank is "Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy"

By
Some positive signs that nuclear utilities can continue to receive positive ratings even while they finance new nuclear plants for the first time in decades: Wells Fargo upgrades SCANA to Outperform from Market Perform Wells analyst says, "YTD, SCG shares have underperformed the Regulated Electrics (total return +2% vs. +9%). Shares trade at 11.3X our 10E EPS, a modest discount to the peer group median of 11.8X. We view the valuation as attractive given a comparatively constructive regulatory environment and potential for above-average long-term EPS growth prospects ... Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy. SCG plans to participate in the development of two regulated nuclear units at a cost of $6.3B, raising legitimate concerns regarding financing and construction. We have carefully considered the risks and are comfortable with SCG’s strategy based on a highly constructive political & regulatory environment, manageable financing needs stretched out over 10 years, strong partners...
Post a Comment
Read more