Skip to main content

Hanford and The Narrative of Nothing

Dino Rossi So the AP wanted a story and by hell or high water, it got one:

The Obama administration's decision to bypass Nevada's Yucca Mountain as a nuclear waste repository should give Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid a boost in his bid for a fifth term. The action is not doing another endangered Democrat, Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, any favors.

That’s because the nuclear waste at Washington’s Hanford site was slated to go to Yucca Mountain and since Murray was fourth in line in the Senate leadership, she should have been able to – do something – about it.

In Washington state, Republican rival Dino Rossi is questioning whether Murray has done enough to challenge Reid and President Barack Obama over Yucca Mountain.

"She's No. 4 in leadership. It's not like she has no power," Rossi said. "She should be able to convince these folks that this is important."

This seems a story about nothing at all. I get that Hanford is a perennial issue in Washington, but Rossi, if he wins the election, will have even less heft than Murray to do anything about Yucca Mountain.

[Rossi’s] biggest complaint is that Murray didn't oppose confirmation of three members to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. During their confirmation, they were asked if they would second-guess the Energy Department's decision to withdraw its license application for Yucca Mountain. Each replied no.

Which evaporates because two of the three commissioners won’t recuse themselves from ruling on the continuation of the Yucca Mountain license review – Energy Secretary Steven Chu is trying to withdraw the license – and the third recused himself for a different reason.

The AP seems to want to cook up a narrative, but there’s just nothing here.


But the AP story did arouse curiosity about the candidate’s stands on nuclear energy – admittedly, it could have been far worse and done that.

On his campaign site, Rossi lists a few energy factlets:

We need to lessen America’s energy dependence by developing more of our own resources.  That means developing more renewable energy sources, increasing our reliance on alternative fuels, and expanding domestic energy production in an environmentally and fiscally responsible way.

  • Oppose job killing energy taxes like cap and trade.
  • Enhance safety procedures for any energy exploration, whether on land or off shore.
  • Ensure polluters pay for any environmental degradation.

Rossi poses with Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) on his home page, and he seems to want to present a similar Republican-in-blue-state moderation mien, so, aside from the cap-and-trade swipe, this could work for any Democratic candidate. However, while running for Governor two years ago – he lost to Democrat Christine Gregoire - he was asked directly about nuclear energy:

Do you support increased use of nuclear power in Washington? If not, why? If so, please explain your position on what should be done with the waste.

I will pursue the increased use of nuclear energy as a clean energy source. The US currently relies on nuclear for approximately 20% of its energy, but little has been done in the recent past to increase the capacity for this zero-emission energy source. Thanks to glassification and other innovative technologies, the storage of nuclear waste is increasingly safe and inexpensive. We should be looking toward nuclear energy as a cost effective, clean and viable energy alternative for a more energy independent future.

No viable strategy to reduce CO2 is possible without nuclear energy. That's why Greenpeace founder Patrick Moore advocates it as a central element of reducing greenhouse gases.

No argument here.


Murray has not said a lot about nuclear energy. We did find this amusing bit:

Energy Northwest operates a workhorse of a nuclear power plant next to the Hanford reservation.

That plant may supply the light for the big dinner Obama and Murray will attend Tuesday. In fact, Energy Northwest's nuclear power plant supplies enough energy to power the entire city of Seattle.

True. And this comes from the Tri-City Herald, which includes the Columbia Power Station.

Here is Murray’s energy page. This stood out among her accomplishments:

Senator Murray has fought so that the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) can provide stable pricing.  She has also fought efforts to increase regional electricity costs.  In the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, Murray secured $3.25 billion in additional borrowing authority to enable BPA to improve transmission lines, get renewable energy sources up and running and create new green jobs.

The stimulus bill, green jobs, energy efficiency – it’s like a progressive trifecta, for good or ill, and exactly how Murray likes it.

Recent polls show Murray running a few points ahead of Rossi. There’s going to be a lot of squeakers come November.


And now for something completely different. The six Republican candidates for New Hampshire Senator all agree on everything:

All said they would have voted against extending long-term unemployment benefits. All argued Elena Kagan should not have been appointed to the Supreme Court. All said man-made global warming hasn't been proven.

And that’s a quorum. The candidates are Kelly Ayotte, Gerard Beloin, Jim Bender, Bill Binnie, Ovide Lamontagne and Dennis Lamare. The primary is September 14. Ayotte is favored in the primary and also favored against Democrat Paul Hodes. Still a ways to go, though.

Republican candidate Dino Rossi.


The technology is there said…
Unlike commercial spent fuel, the defense high level wastes at Hanford, Savannah River, and Idaho have no potential future value. This is the kind of stuff that we need to put into real disposal.

Look at very deep boreholes. The technology for drilling extremely deep holes, over 5 kilometers, has advanced enormously since 1987 when Yucca Mountain was picked. Over 70% of the U.S. has deep, crystalline basement rock within 2 km of the surface, providing ideal conditions for borehole disposal.

Deep boreholes provide perfect isolation for millions of years, it's easy to prove, and it's the right thing to do. Defense high level waste from Hanford is the perfect stuff to use to demonstrate the technology for deep borehole disposal.

And I like Senator Murray. She's a bright lady.

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…

Nuclear Is a Long-Term Investment for Ohio that Will Pay Big

With 50 different state legislative calendars, more than half of them adjourn by June, and those still in session throughout the year usually take a recess in the summer. So springtime is prime time for state legislative activity. In the next few weeks, legislatures are hosting hearings and calling for votes on bills that have been battered back and forth in the capital halls.

On Tuesday, The Ohio Public Utilities Committee hosted its third round of hearings on the Zero Emissions Nuclear Resources Program, House Bill 178, and NEI’s Maria Korsnick testified before a jam-packed room of legislators.

Washingtonians parachuting into state debates can be a tricky platform, but in this case, Maria’s remarks provided national perspective that put the Ohio conundrum into context. At the heart of this debate is the impact nuclear plants have on local jobs and the local economy, and that nuclear assets should be viewed as “long-term investments” for the state. Of course, clean air and electrons …