Skip to main content

Hydraulic Fracturing

With the release of the "Pickens Plan" in 2008, natural gas gained added currency as a "bridge" fuel that could reduce our dependence on oil for transportation and displace coal for baseload electrical generation. The appeal was fueled by a rapid rise in the amount of natural gas coming from new domestic sources, primarily gas-bearing shales.

While proponents have talked confidently about the potential for abundant natural gas from shales, others have expressed concern about reports of environmental damage from the chemicals used in extracting gas from shale. Home Box Office (HBO) weighed in this summer with a film full of scare stories about those chemicals. According to HBO, the film, Gasland, features "...interviews with ordinary citizens whose lives have been irreparably altered by hydraulic fracturing." The HBO web site adds, "Part verite road trip, part expose, part mystery, and part showdown, Gasland follows director Josh Fox on a 24-state investigation of the environmental effects of hydraulic fracturing."

With its parade of pitiful victims with wrenching tales of personal health tragedies, Gasland is emotionally gripping. We are in no position to judge the balance or accuracy in its rendering of the facts, but note that the artful style of the film has much in common with documentaries and films produced by spirited opponents of the nuclear power industry. Gasland has prompted numerous responses from proponents of shale gas, including for example, the Natural Gas Supply Association and the American Clean Skies Foundation. (Both sites also provide information explaining the extraction process).

Hydraulic fracturing entails injecting water under extremely high pressure to open fissures in gas-bearing rock formations deep underground. Chemical and physical additives mixed with the drilling ("fracking") fluid enhance the release of the embedded natural gas and facilitate its movement to the return pipe to the surface. Drillers consider the precise mix of additives they use to be proprietary. In most states, drillers have not been required to disclose the contents of their proprietary drilling fluids. In the Energy Policy Act of 2005, fraccing mixtures were exempted from federal coverage by the Clean Water Act. However, this July, the Senate's draft "Clean Energy Jobs and Oil Company Accountability Act of 2010" included a provision (Title XLIII) that would require disclosure of fracking mixtures by 2012, unless required sooner by a state. Additional scrutiny of hydraulic fracturing is coming from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which is researching the impacts of hydraulic fracturing and has been soliciting public input on the subject.

Whatever one thinks of the risks and benefits of gas from shale, this summer's publicity on hydraulic fracturing illustrates that political risk must be considered alongside other risks associated with each energy policy option. For this and many other reasons, we strongly support a diverse energy supply and an "all-of-the-above" national energy policy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…

Nuclear Is a Long-Term Investment for Ohio that Will Pay Big

With 50 different state legislative calendars, more than half of them adjourn by June, and those still in session throughout the year usually take a recess in the summer. So springtime is prime time for state legislative activity. In the next few weeks, legislatures are hosting hearings and calling for votes on bills that have been battered back and forth in the capital halls.

On Tuesday, The Ohio Public Utilities Committee hosted its third round of hearings on the Zero Emissions Nuclear Resources Program, House Bill 178, and NEI’s Maria Korsnick testified before a jam-packed room of legislators.


Washingtonians parachuting into state debates can be a tricky platform, but in this case, Maria’s remarks provided national perspective that put the Ohio conundrum into context. At the heart of this debate is the impact nuclear plants have on local jobs and the local economy, and that nuclear assets should be viewed as “long-term investments” for the state. Of course, clean air and electrons …