Skip to main content

How Do You Haiku?

Did you know that yesterday, April 17, was National Haiku Poetry Day? Well, we sure did—and to have a little fun, we decided to launch a contest on our Facebook page to see who could write the best nuclear energy-related haiku. Not sure how the contest would go over with our fans, I was surprised to see that people came out of the woodwork to share some of the most creative haikus I have ever seen, making this the start of more fun contests to come on our page!

To select a winner, we asked our Facebook friends and Twitter followers to ‘like’ their favorite haiku. This morning, we announced that the winning entry came from Southern Co.’s Leah Burch:

Energy we need,
for society to feed,
Nuclear indeed.

She won a “Nuclear. Clean Air Energy” water bottle, which I will be putting in the mail to her later this afternoon.

imageNow, if you recall from your 9th grade English classes, haikus follow a 5-7-5 format, meaning five syllables on the first and third lines, and seven syllables on the middle line. I spent most of the day yesterday counting to five or seven and also checking Merriam Webster’s dictionary on occasion to verify the number of syllables in a word.

Something I learned from one of our Facebook followers Chris Kolar is that the word “nuclear” has three syllables. Some say “nu-clear” or “nuke-U-lar” (remind you of a Bushism?), but Webster’s has it at “nu-cle-ar.” This came in handy for some folks, as a few had to re-submit their entries. But all in all, it was a fun activity for our Facebook friends and we hope to do this kind of thing more often (especially now that we know all of the hidden talent out there!).

Below is a sampling of the haiku entries, but visit our Facebook page (and LIKE us if you haven’t already!) to see the complete list. It’s good stuff!

From Mary Beth Ginder:

Leading the way to,
Energy independence,
Nuclear is key.

From Eric Phillips:

Nuclear fission
Green energy, no carbon
Electricity

From Lori Kasserman:

Nuclear is key,
to our energy future,
Clean, safe, effective.

From Tedd T.J. Mulholland Weitzman:

Safety first provides,
energy to serve our world.
Southern Nuclear.

From Matt Williams:

Nuclear power
Clean, safe and reliable
Big part of the mix.

From John Dobken:

Nuclear is green,
To the eye it is unseen
And certainly clean.

From AREVA’s Facebook page:

Energy hungry
Carbon dinosaur revenge
Fresh breath. Nuclear.

From Lori Smith-Nielsen:

Nuclear power
Renaissance is here to stay
Clean is good for all

From Lynnmarie P. Kinney:

Nuclear power
Mini, but mighty atom
Energize my world.

Thank you to all who participated in our contest!

Image credits: From the “Haiku and Happiness” blog.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…

Nuclear Is a Long-Term Investment for Ohio that Will Pay Big

With 50 different state legislative calendars, more than half of them adjourn by June, and those still in session throughout the year usually take a recess in the summer. So springtime is prime time for state legislative activity. In the next few weeks, legislatures are hosting hearings and calling for votes on bills that have been battered back and forth in the capital halls.

On Tuesday, The Ohio Public Utilities Committee hosted its third round of hearings on the Zero Emissions Nuclear Resources Program, House Bill 178, and NEI’s Maria Korsnick testified before a jam-packed room of legislators.


Washingtonians parachuting into state debates can be a tricky platform, but in this case, Maria’s remarks provided national perspective that put the Ohio conundrum into context. At the heart of this debate is the impact nuclear plants have on local jobs and the local economy, and that nuclear assets should be viewed as “long-term investments” for the state. Of course, clean air and electrons …