Skip to main content

How Does a Solar Eclipse Impact the Electric Grid?

Millions of Americans traveled long distances in hopes of getting a front-row seat for the dance of the heavens today, watching the moon eclipse the sun, from Portland, Oregon, to Charleston, South Carolina. Hundreds more had spent months preparing for an odd complication of the event: the very sudden loss of up to 9,000 megawatts as solar panels were cast into shadow, and then its very quick return. The lost production is the equivalent of about fifteen good-sized coal plants.

How do you keep the lights on when the sun suddenly goes out? The loss and rebound of generation is much larger than the system usually faces, but experts made some serious advance preparation, and were hopeful  largely because of the diversity of generators. Nuclear plants continue to provide the backbone of the system, and generators running on natural gas were called on to power up quickly, and as the sun reappeared, power down even faster.

Such diversity is important because the system has to function through more frequent challenges, like extreme cold, water droughts, wind droughts and other problems.

The eclipse will vary from place to place. The path of the totality crosses twelve states; but the geometry is such that planners knew that the sun would be 95% obscured in parts of northern California, and 72% obscured in southern Nevada, which is electrically integrated with California.

At times, California gets 40 percent of its energy from solar panels, and depending on cloud cover, it was set up to lose nearly three-quarters of that. The California independent grid operator calculated in advance that power output will drop by 70 megawatts a minute (A megawatt is enough to run a Walmart Supercenter) and then come roaring back at 90 megawatts a minute, about eight times faster than in a normal day, because after the shadow passes, the sun will be more nearly directly overhead.

That organization, the California Independent System Operator, urged utilities to be ready; so did its counterpart in the Middle Atlantic states, the PJM Interconnection. PJM used to stand for Pennsylvania-Jersey-Maryland, but the system now extends into Virginia and West Virginia, Ohio and the Chicago area.

Power grids are not set up for eclipses, which happen much faster than a sunrise or a sunset, and over a broader area than a typical cloud bank covers. The North American Electric Reliability Corporation, the entity that establishes and enforces grid rules, told other areas with high solar penetration, including Nevada and North Carolina, to prepare detailed analyses.

California was in somewhat better shape because the drought is ending and more water is available this year; hydro plants can raise and lower their output very quickly.

The next North American eclipse will be in April 2024, when the solar panel impact may be larger.
Power systems have tried various means to cope. In 2015, Italy unplugged its large solar installations, to reduce instability on the system. But this problem can only become more serious as solar penetration increases. Most of Spain will be covered by an eclipse in August 2026.

The obvious solution is to maintain a diverse generating portfolio that limits the threat to the system because of interruptions from any single source.

UPDATE: Thanks to our friends at TVA for this stunning shot of the solar eclipse above the Watts Bar Nuclear Generating Station in Tennessee.

Photo courtesy of TVA.
 The above is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...