Skip to main content

Why the Electricity Market Needs Reprogramming

The Energy Department’s study of the power grid is 187 pages long but it can be summarized in five words: the energy markets are failing us.

"Society places value on attributes of electricity provision beyond those compensated by the current design of the wholesale market," the study found.

Economists like to say that markets "optimize" production and consumption; that is, they set prices in a way that induces suppliers to bring forth the right amount of whatever is being traded, and lets consumers make wise decisions about how much to use, all in a way that improves everybody’s welfare. That’s true, as far as it goes.

But markets are a little like computer programs; they only do what they’re told to. The best they can do is to optimize the factor they’ve been told to use, in this case, price. The market is a tyrant with a hyper-focused goal. The electricity markets are set up almost entirely to optimize price.
But if the economy needs anything else, some policy intervention is required.

And there is a lot of intervention in the energy marketplace already. There are production tax credits for wind, investment tax credits for solar, and state quotas for both of them. There are big hydroelectric projects built by state governments or Washington. There are programs to reduce demand by collecting money from all customers, and spending it to improve the energy efficiency of others.

We need intervention now to preserve other benefits that nuclear reactors provide: resilience, diversity and reliability in the electric system; economic stimulus in the places where the plants are located; domestic industrial capability and self-sufficiency in technologies related to national defense; and clean air everywhere.

Reactors are an insurance policy against supply interruptions in gas, which are a virtual certainly in some regions in cold weather, and against coal piles that have frozen solid, and hydroelectric dams crippled by drought. Each of these reactors provides many hundreds of jobs directly, and their payrolls are the heart of the small-town economies where they operate. Their property taxes are essential to municipal budgets.

These benefits used to come without asking.

When the price of natural gas was high, and before extensive government help for renewables at the state and federal levels, the market imperfections didn’t matter to our country’s long-term goals. Now they do, and the Energy Department report recognizes that.

"Ultimately, the continued closure of traditional baseload power plants calls for a comprehensive strategy for long-term reliability and resilience," the study said. "States and regions are accepting increased risks that could affect the future reliability and resilience of electricity delivery for consumers in their regions."

It said, "a continual comprehensive regional and national review is needed to determine how a portfolio of domestic energy resources can be developed to ensure grid reliability and resilience."

We have heard some discussion lately about how policy interventions in the electricity field will threaten the “sanctity” of the markets. Markets are useful but they are not sacred. And policy can be smarter.

The above is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.


Popular posts from this blog

A Billion Miles Under Nuclear Energy (Updated)

And the winner is…Cassini-Huygens, in triple overtime.

The spaceship conceived in 1982 and launched fifteen years later, will crash into Saturn on September 15, after a mission of 19 years and 355 days, powered by the audacity and technical prowess of scientists and engineers from 17 different countries, and 72 pounds of plutonium.

The mission was so successful that it was extended three times; it was intended to last only until 2008.

Since April, the ship has been continuing to orbit Saturn, swinging through the 1,500-mile gap between the planet and its rings, an area not previously explored. This is a good maneuver for a spaceship nearing the end of its mission, since colliding with a rock could end things early.

Cassini will dive a little deeper and plunge toward Saturn’s surface, where it will transmit data until it burns up in the planet’s atmosphere. The radio signal will arrive here early Friday morning, Eastern time. A NASA video explains.

In the years since Cassini has launc…

Sneak Peek

There's an invisible force powering and propelling our way of life.
It's all around us. You can't feel it. Smell it. Or taste it.
But it's there all the same. And if you look close enough, you can see all the amazing and wondrous things it does.
It not only powers our cities and towns.
And all the high-tech things we love.
It gives us the power to invent.
To explore.
To discover.
To create advanced technologies.
This invisible force creates jobs out of thin air.
It adds billions to our economy.
It's on even when we're not.
And stays on no matter what Mother Nature throws at it.
This invisible force takes us to the outer reaches of outer space.
And to the very depths of our oceans.
It brings us together. And it makes us better.
And most importantly, it has the power to do all this in our lifetime while barely leaving a trace.
Some people might say it's kind of unbelievable.
They wonder, what is this new power that does all these extraordinary things?

Missing the Point about Pennsylvania’s Nuclear Plants

A group that includes oil and gas companies in Pennsylvania released a study on Monday that argues that twenty years ago, planners underestimated the value of nuclear plants in the electricity market. According to the group, that means the state should now let the plants close.


The question confronting the state now isn’t what the companies that owned the reactors at the time of de-regulation got or didn’t get. It’s not a question of whether they were profitable in the '80s, '90s and '00s. It’s about now. Business works by looking at the present and making projections about the future.

Is losing the nuclear plants what’s best for the state going forward?

Pennsylvania needs clean air. It needs jobs. And it needs protection against over-reliance on a single fuel source.

What the reactors need is recognition of all the value they provide. The electricity market is depressed, and if electricity is treated as a simple commodity, with no regard for its benefit to clean air o…