Skip to main content

NEI Energy Markets Report (March 27th - 31st)

By

Here's a summary of what went on in the energy markets last week:

Electricity prices mostly decreased throughout the country (see pages 1 & 2). Gas prices at the Henry Hub rose $0.08 to $7.18/MMBtu (see page 4).

From 2006-2010, the expected capacities coming online are 38,570 MW for natural gas, 36,146 MW for coal and 17,466 MW for wind (see page 7).

Nuclear capacity availability was at 82% last week. Fifteen units were in refueling outages. Palo Verde 3 and Palisades began their refueling outages and Hatch 1 completed its refueling outage in about 44 days (see pages 2 & 3).

For the report click here (pdf). It is also located on NEI's Nuclear Statistics webpage.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , ,

Comments

David Bradish said…
Nick,

Appreciate the comments. This is a projection of actual orders over the next 5 years.

If you check out the report you will see what the expected capacities coming online are for each year up to 2010. Here's what the report classifies as capacities coming online:

"Data includes units that are/have planned, filed for permit(s), under test conditions, under construction, undergoing feasibility study, or site preparation underway."

Global Energy Decisions (the data provider) keeps track of every "New Entrants" project taking place. They have actual data on the unit, company, capacity, status etc. and are not forecasts.

This is the actual data of what's expected to come online. That's the benefit of this type of service versus looking at annual forecasts from EIA. This data changes a little bit each month and every time we get the monthly update we want to show whats going on in the short term.

You won't see expected nuclear capacities till 2015 or so. Nuclear is the only energy which is not on the list.

We expect that the readers will understand that the reasons wind and gas capacities taper off in 2009 and 2010 is due to shorter construction periods like you noted. Coal takes a little more planning and that's why you see more capacities added in the later years.
April 5, 2006 at 10:20 PM
David Bradish said…
Nick,

I like your new wording and think it might be a more correct way of stating it. I'm a statistician and think deeply about numbers and not as much about wording.

Yes, wind is doing quite well for itself.

The most recent capacity factors we have right now are for 2004. 2005 figures should be posted here in the next couple of weeks.

Here's a link to 2004:
http://www.nei.org/documents/
U.S._Capacity_Factors_by_Fuel_Type.pdf
April 6, 2006 at 10:15 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

By
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
23 comments
Read more

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

By
Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...
7 comments
Read more

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

By
You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...
6 comments
Read more