Obama surrogates Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Gov. Jennifer Granholm (D-MI), and Rep. Allyson Schwartz (D-PA) discussed the RNC's "Balance" ad with reporters in a just-completed conference call. Below is a transcription of the final question asked during the Q&A.
Hi, it's Susan Demas, again, from MIRS newsletter. The ad says that Senator Obama is against nuclear power and I was wondering what his position is on nuclear and I was also wondering if an increase in nuclear power could help your states with providing jobs.[Snip]
This is Josh Earnest with the [Obama] campaign. I can take the first part of that. As you point out, that is a very misleading attack against Senator Obama's proposals. What he has said is that he wants to work to find a safe way to store the waste that is generated by nuclear energy production. And once we can do that, he would be supportive of considering expanding nuclear options to increase our energy capacity in this country.
I'll leave it to somebody else if they want to talk about the impact on local economies.
Granholm: His [Obama's] position papers online state very clearly that it's unlikely we're going to meet these climate goals if we eliminate nuclear power from the table. So he does not oppose nuclear energy. What he wants to do is, what's [been] suggested, is find a way to store it and make it secure.
Comments
I hope he'll realize that the day after electrions, though.
Hope for America! :-)
-t7-
He is a great speaker, and even better at playing all sides.
OK
is that why no one anywhere in the world has ever built one of these reactors beyond small, government-funded demonstration facilities?
What are the capital costs like for IFR and molten salt, anyway? And how does the cost of treating HLW this way compare with once-through?
Combine this with issues like no drilling and more taxes during tough economic times and it looks like the Republicans will be staying in power to me.
http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/designs/ifr/anlw.html
-t7-
Sadly, I can't think of many reasons to vote for McCain. Nuclear energy is one of them, obviously. And there are a few others where Obama's positions are clearly against life.
I hate voting for the lesser of two evils: Obama - proletariot dictatorship or McCain - Corporate Empire. But that's what I shall do - vote against Obama.
In addition, he wants us to get more creative with the waste it produces, rather than trucking it around the country - a roulette sort of move if ever there was one.
I will vote for the guy with the open mind who also thinks these things through. Obama '08